Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01
Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Thu, 30 April 2020 14:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F873A0AB9; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdcCknIDhN1K; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x935.google.com (mail-ua1-x935.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::935]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83F273A0ABB; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x935.google.com with SMTP id r2so680347uam.7; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wLBR0c8i9hbt9WdoORN4Xiy/qjUgRIJmICdzW0QdTo8=; b=Kpbdb7WQeo0kqu0Ehns5vKk4C9Ky6cUX2f3mbho1hPzOY6l5k+cWgUp53L7x4+uqZ6 LO7GEWQh15Oi56GnQnIe6lJUjsjDFyhfjo7OSECDd1+roFi4yXXQvRluj/ixAelsOd+M OZFapE3D6gVxuxYWYRwlpDuFbkXTGdZAHZoCryaQN/WnxgugNZVvd3i47IDaprD/woVj Tp+E76eYylBvBPoxhRJ8Z8I6FmrkdfXRJK9KelJTWFgZYOPJDMj43suGwP0SiVmWDGXu LGEVwb+oNxW66TbFfl6NUCWl5e6cZdfyJDwATe2RVtEqut7TiRp4u5A59ES5xj0pw1tr YAZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wLBR0c8i9hbt9WdoORN4Xiy/qjUgRIJmICdzW0QdTo8=; b=X7iMY932OnXLewl5Oxvdw4mkY+jl6PErdcruzg9yoCRsGMXKIwdrimFMhvwgKYczwd TPt+c7RZvvuDFFgUuMjk/pRQDG3B6WN9YcAexEGu585OEOoc7QxNTQSbo/weLQPZ6yF3 PdUOYFwDEx5qva/gIrHwQmy2mndxiALU9jQgEwoPtM03fhkjNYkMiaoqd49K4daUpCTd 0B2Iz9/t6L22A9e1SA5/qXylh1y5rtE1joSig7aWPu10O3mkh2lGU/EANbOqJRcK7Dtt wGYv6BvauV50gbx34HGbn7hkHDukEdYk7dfan8DxdmtOuMEPPEOdnkYrIJqwqmOhVKw8 S9AA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZV0yDdciSMe3ljuOKDYzumgKMnzMcqOPtmXBxQgzvbqvvVPEJ4 8Tbu72tepskKezJVQ587ASjhSSAxHDX+wF9LxX4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIpOapYbgOfmpLq1eTxuukUPUocSA+Jo4S234hq4HTj8Mr7smXiefSl+6Ww7Un5kT+jZ2TnrIGUJ80qcFFM/1Y=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:10d:: with SMTP id 13mr2968778uak.56.1588258770044; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158825009899.14758.9073634112286890166@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJLL9mb_1vzKV6JG=5rr7izLL3UTmcv=0JKeAm-Knk5ysw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLL9mb_1vzKV6JG=5rr7izLL3UTmcv=0JKeAm-Knk5ysw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:58:54 +0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUf15BJcHqyy7NyTv-QqxdWLYPDsWdthXzjX_qaERENTrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ccca9a05a4834ff6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/tUpkVGofHCNq6ULs3NbePo4WUwA>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:59:35 -0000
Hi Barry, Thank you for the fast response and addressing the comments. Have a nice day, Ines. On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:13 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > Thanks for your review, Ines. Reasonable comments, and we'll consider > them as we go into IESG Evaluation. (On comment 3, I'm just going to > make the necessary change myself, and remove the CREF, so it's moot.) > > Barry > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 8:35 AM Ines Robles via Datatracker > <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > > like any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > Document: draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01 > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > > Review Date: 2020-04-30 > > IETF LC End Date: 2020-04-30 > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > > > Summary: > > > > This document provides a one-time interpretation of the eligibility > rules (BCP > > 10) that is required for the exceptional situation of the cancellation > of the > > in-person IETF 107 meeting. This document only affects the seating of the > > 2020-2021 NomCom and any rules that relate to NomCom eligibility or > process > > before IETF 108, and does not set a precedent for the future. > > > > The document is clear and well written. Please find some comments below. > > > > Major issues: Not found > > Minor issues: Not found > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > Some comments/questions: > > > > 1- It would be nice to add a reference here > > > > Section 1: > > > > "...resulting in its conversion to a limited-agenda virtual meeting, > with remote > > participation only.": > > > > e.g. [IETF 107 Virtual] = > > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Gqc4-GIsnvccObQrrciL_Vm0HMU/ > > > > 2- Should this clarification be added? > > > > " ...before IETF 108..." --> "...before IETF 108 (virtual or in-person > > meeting)..." e.g. in the introduction or in section 3. > > > > 3- Related to this comment > > [https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kHVPn0tyF5o4Rvd3aZ51JA2MDtU/ > ] > > > > "... In section 2, last paragraph, I suggest changing the CREF to, > "Note: The > > previous two sentences will be replaced before publication with, 'This > document > > contains the outcome of that discussion.'...." > > > > Should this suggestion be applied? > > > > Note that CREF2 mentions "the previous sentence", not "the previous two > > sentences...." > > > > 4- It would be nice to add a reference to eligibility-discuss mailing > list/ > > draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand > > > > Section 3: > > > > "...as there will be time for proper community work on such an update..." > > > > Thus, e.g. "...community work on such an update (e.g. efforts such as > > [Eligibility-discuss-ml] and [Eligibility-criteria])" > > > > [Eligibility-discuss-ml]= > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/ > > [Eligibility-criteria]= > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand/ > > > > Thank you for this document, > > > > Ines. > > > > > > >
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-iesg-n… Ines Robles via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Ines Robles
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Alissa Cooper