Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa-04

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Mon, 30 January 2012 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AC311E80B0; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:53:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.162, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f+CgZOuU+5jj; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:53:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B6011E80BF; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:53:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0ULrRvr003917; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:53:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ogud@ogud.com)
Message-ID: <4F271155.9080001@ogud.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:53:25 -0500
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
References: <4f2570c6.11840e0a.6db6.09c6@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f2570c6.11840e0a.6db6.09c6@mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.20.30.4
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:58:17 -0800
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa.all@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, 'IETF-Discussion list' <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:53:48 -0000

On 29/01/2012 11:12, Roni Even wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa-04
>
> Reviewer: Roni Even
>
> Review Date:2012–1–29
>
> IETF LC End Date: 2012–2–7
>
> IESG Telechat date:
>
> Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
>
> Major issues:
>
> The first IANA action is to update
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.txt which
> requires standard action for adding values.
>

Grrrrrr, my fault, overlooked that the editors put this text in the
header of the document.
WG LC was for standards track document.

Please treat this document as standards track.

> Minor issues:
>
> The important note in section 6 talks about the values in the examples.
> I am wondering why not update the document with the correct values after
> the IANA assignments by the RFC editor.

Yes, once we have the IANA assigned values we will furnish the 
RFC-editor with better examples.


>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
>
>
thanks for the review

	Olafur (document pusher)