IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 31 May 2016 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E9212D5FD; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CrOUCz18gPiA; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5291712B026; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id x189so191329316ywe.3; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=5CduAx5ultbwnSVLkT8a76kuZGMFfzp3vnbRiatDY9g=; b=O8yJJSjIQg7Uz5p9vjvAY/IVn6LC90kaB1OKnXddBOAQTBcFfYD5eS81xv/rjEqXqs 6cCr9VCTNw6A3cf4rHjlCVSIsSlbEJ1Cyf58eeuOJ0ErvNLxi2T25KkxbP5lTiMMN8S7 cTaAsg5xkc6zrRIcLb/2MMbBF5mEqc2BwpZmIK0IiEzV62CM5iy4EjWs72ip7mtb4SSK PjgBxEwtF/SMpPIgeCMQsvScrEsKt+QV6+8Z+MLy1y0TQua2yYoBwZr9Xih/MAdzb7oz vJ395u2z7EC3dgW9e/lF18bHPNwu+riTN61ipvBacnmwkDnJ1Wm5/AuSmVMMnBhDClkh vR9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=5CduAx5ultbwnSVLkT8a76kuZGMFfzp3vnbRiatDY9g=; b=CrPTfhjouBujCTyTVkW9xvtk27dpLp7zVkZaLtVPEk4ktxPyfNfE7pfJwwwmsGZA68 wcay/wxj2EVxNApr6q86kEbKQd23wLcfhpGGSvUEU2+3T+E5nvdri1pix/iur06/zVTN UdYnz947OTdcvF3Y1C4sui3XlO7AsO+BUewKohUKNUaX1+STGngwa1xpupSziigW9bVl Em1WeF1GyMBZaPPgDnVkL2Jv90Erjer8QLsH9AG9CWuwQm4YfMJ78QuBrYr6pyn1x7m4 Q2GPtjE9CZShiD4gCZnMpLptLZV9SnLnpctXfochP3W1523kEUpN2kBSZnc/Tz23/3Fw neUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tII/Vzee7m7SpRzhWePGMaQzg4D3y7UYzqSyDMO75KSFzvYmoxKeRt/WZA3cJ691c0ysdtrb36WQF9feA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.71.3 with SMTP id u3mr19929611ywa.143.1464707523686; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.203.139 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F561BEC@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
References: <e75b3328-c782-ca66-6f3a-a0baf3e3c705@alum.mit.edu> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F561977@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <37a0376d-93bb-5013-543d-e675dd4189e1@alum.mit.edu> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F561BEC@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:12:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fwDGMe1xHAhRjuG9jr9ZZrFh-9ghEFV=0CHXoReC1+Lw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114d729aa6437b053424cbcb"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/tto8drulv1-lKXD_XLPqIf9elp0>
Cc: "draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 15:12:06 -0000

Hi, Paul,

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Black, David <david.black@emc.com> wrote:

> Paul,
>
> > > So, (as WG chair for this paragraph only), thank you for your input,
> but this is a
> > single draft for very good reasons.
> > > </WG chair hat>
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation. The thing about genart reviews is that the
> > reviewer doesn't have the context that the authors do, and maybe not the
> > context that likely readers will have. I certainly won't second guess
> > you on that.
>
> And double-checking this sort of thing is one of the purposes of Gen-ART
> reviews (said as a long-time former Gen-ART reviewer), so thanks for
> bringing this topic up - if nothing else, we now have this concern and
> response documented in email archives for IESG review of this draft ;-).


David beat me to it, but I do want to say that (as another long-time former
Gen-ART reviewer) I'm very interested in FIRST guesses from reviewers who
haven't been involved in every discussion of every revision of the draft.

I'm sure there's a forest behind all these trees someplace :-)

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email