Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 14 October 2015 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE841A88CB; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cx-P28LInK5E; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8C41A87A5; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FC72CC6C; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:41:21 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mSIai2Uu_ZR1; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:41:20 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F582CC6B; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:41:20 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_273C7038-33DE-4C0C-801D-E3723EF9E9A6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR05MB1985CDFA2E8A95253CE8AB28AE4E0@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:41:19 +0300
Message-Id: <C75D5BEC-3066-4C32-A4EA-B2DDE786CBBB@piuha.net>
References: <46A1A261-E9F4-414D-AAD8-9C85A8B53283@vigilsec.com> <C04BC7C8-5697-4CE3-B447-FEE7F69FD55C@vigilsec.com> <BLUPR05MB1985CDFA2E8A95253CE8AB28AE4E0@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/tv8CWPAHJVpeHR9-ANOlGFAmaME>
Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:41:24 -0000

Thank you Russ, thank you Ron.

Jari

On 29 Sep 2015, at 17:38, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:

> Russ,
> 
> Agree on both points. I have:
> 
> - removed the word "unique"
> - moved Section 6 to an appendix
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
>                                   Ron
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:30 AM
>> To: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping.all@ietf.org
>> Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>; IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
>> ART, please see the FAQ at
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
>> may receive.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
>> Reviewer: Russ Housley
>> Review Date: 2014-09-25
>> IETF LC End Date: 2014-10-02
>> IESG Telechat date: unknown
>> 
>> Summary:  Ready.
>> 
>> Major Concerns:  None.
>> 
>> Minor Concerns:  None.
>> 
>> Other Comments:
>> 
>> At the end of Section 1, the document says: "Each protocol listens on its own
>> UDP port and executes its own unique procedures."  What does "unique"
>> mean here?  What changes if "unique" is dropped from this sentence?
>> 
>> Would it be more obvious to the reader the purpose of Section 6 if it were
>> turned into an appendix?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art