Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04

Thank you Russ, thank you Ron.

Jari

On 29 Sep 2015, at 17:38, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:

> Russ,
> 
> Agree on both points. I have:
> 
> - removed the word "unique"
> - moved Section 6 to an appendix
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
>                                   Ron
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:30 AM
>> To: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping.all@ietf.org
>> Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>; IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
>> ART, please see the FAQ at
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
>> may receive.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
>> Reviewer: Russ Housley
>> Review Date: 2014-09-25
>> IETF LC End Date: 2014-10-02
>> IESG Telechat date: unknown
>> 
>> Summary:  Ready.
>> 
>> Major Concerns:  None.
>> 
>> Minor Concerns:  None.
>> 
>> Other Comments:
>> 
>> At the end of Section 1, the document says: "Each protocol listens on its own
>> UDP port and executes its own unique procedures."  What does "unique"
>> mean here?  What changes if "unique" is dropped from this sentence?
>> 
>> Would it be more obvious to the reader the purpose of Section 6 if it were
>> turned into an appendix?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04

Attachment: signature.asc