Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-trill-oam-mib-06

"Deepak Kumar (dekumar)" <dekumar@cisco.com> Sun, 16 August 2015 05:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dekumar@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765661A88B3; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 22:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xf4HGlU-RmoS; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 22:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF731A88AE; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 22:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4024; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1439704038; x=1440913638; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rWdTN3rmjxctR4UOer+ZB24MYyfV2UVPfmQNeX0fnQ0=; b=W59rqk6oj+NsDKJyLgemaGloDYB/VWXtibINZC1wzpZPR0S1bkcfW40m lWBrR6MwIoxiC3Z3jTZ97PeqBYYfaNO3NNDBuBJ9i87ykkNAikryaid5M Ct0M1d3TzkbmREftoK5kfQXnuRSg6/n7uLQDtWmCsdSGlXHONf6sUJgxB U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CXAgD3ItBV/4ENJK1dgxtUaQa9XQEJgXWFeQKBLzgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCQBAQQ6TwIBCBQiECERJQIEARKIGQMSDchcDYVXAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBARqLUoJPgWJfhCwFlR0BhQOFe4FtgUpGg2WDGolihzYmgg4cgVNxAYEFQoEEAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,688,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="20848643"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2015 05:47:17 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7G5lHMg031047 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:47:17 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 00:47:16 -0500
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (173.37.183.81) by xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 00:47:16 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com ([169.254.7.85]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 00:47:16 -0500
From: "Deepak Kumar (dekumar)" <dekumar@cisco.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, Gen Art <gen-art@ietf.org>, "Samer Salam (ssalam)" <ssalam@cisco.com>, Tissa Senevirathne <tsenevir@gmail.com>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, "trill-chairs@ietf.org" <trill-chairs@ietf.org>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Last Call review of draft-ietf-trill-oam-mib-06
Thread-Index: AQHQ1vtj8bJc6N5VG0aq2aTshhSM3p4N/oMA
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:47:15 +0000
Message-ID: <D1F5713C.E1CB8%dekumar@cisco.com>
References: <55CE9892.4010600@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55CE9892.4010600@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.4.150722
x-originating-ip: [173.37.102.11]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <EBB483EC8860CC4580885AA6E68720E6@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/uj14n5yd9DU2cDmAklhDOhi20sE>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-trill-oam-mib-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:47:20 -0000

Hi Tom,

Thanks for detailed review.
I have taken care of all comments except need guidance on below comment.

4) Has any thought been given to including an indication of when the
counters were last reset (e.g, due to restart)?

Please provide more details on scenario of restart.


Thanks,
Deepak

On 8/14/15, 6:40 PM, "Tom Taylor" <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote:

>I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>
><http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
>Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>you may receive. Sorry for the late review, but there was a pile of
>reading to do in preparation. I admit I did not read the whole 1800
>pages of 802.1Q.
>
>Tom Taylor
>
>Document: draft-ietf-trill-oam-mib-06
>Reviewer: Tom Taylor
>Review Date:        2015-08-14
>IETF LC End Date:   2015-08-13
>IESG Telechat date: 2015-08-20
>
>Summary: Not quite ready. Minor issues and editorials/nits.
>
>Major issues:
>
>Minor issues:
>
>1) Section 5.2 states that IEEE8021ServiceSelectorType has two values.
>In fact, 801-1Q-2014 enumerates more than that. I'd suggest a slight
>change in wording to reflect this:
>
>OLD
>
>IEEE8021-TC-MIB defines IEEE8021ServiceSelectorType with two values:
>
>- 1 representing a vlanId, and
>
>- 2 representing a 24 bit isid.
>
>NEW
>
>The IEEE8021-TC-MIB definition of IEEE8021ServiceSelectorType includes
>the two values:
>
>- 1 representing a vlanId, and
>
>- 2 representing a 24 bit isid.
>
>2) Section 6.2 indicates that TRILL OAM has no support for Link Trace
>Message/Reply. Perhaps text could be added to say why this is so (i.e.,
>that Path Trace has been substituted, as indicated in Sec. 10 of RFC
>7455, and has been supplemented by Multi-destination Tree Verification
>Message/Reply).
>
>3) "Reference Overview" in the MIB module header indicates that the
>TRILL MIB module refers to the original CFM document, IEEE 802.1ag-2007,
>instead of IEEE 802.1-Q-2014. Why the older starting point?
>
>4) Has any thought been given to including an indication of when the
>counters were last reset (e.g, due to restart)?
>
>5) description of trillOamMepTxPtmStatus refers to the MEP Initiator
>State Machine. Reference should include pointer to the description of
>this state machine. Where is it defined? -- not in RFC 7455. Similar
>comment regarding the description of trillOamMepTxMtvmStatus.
>
>6) Description of trillOamMepTxPtmMessages: there is no indication in
>RFC 7455 of how this limit is used. More text is needed here. Does
>number of hops affect the count of transmitted messages against this
>limit? Similar comment regarding the description of
>trillOamMepTxMtvmMessages.
>
>7) Surely this document has normative dependencies on 802.1Q and the
>LLDP-MIB, for which no reference is given, BTW.
>
>
>Nits/editorial comments:
>
>1) Under "Abbreviations" in the MIB module header, definition of SNMP
>Agent, need to spell out NE. Similarly, spell out EMS and NMS in the
>next definition.
>
>2) Description of trillOamMepTable: s/rowsare/rows are/
>
>3) in the descriptions of trillOamMepPtrFlag and
>trillOamMepPtrErrorCode, incorrect section numbers for RFC 7455 are
>given in the references. Should be 8.4.3?
>
>4) Description of trillOamMepPtrIngress: s/PTM/PTR/. Similar comment for
>trillOamMepPtrEgress.
>
>5) Syntax error for trillOamMepPtrIngressPortIdSubtype: syntax should be
>LldpPortIdSubtype. Descriptions of trillOamMepPtrIngressPortIdSubtype
>and trillOamMepPtrIngressPortId should be interchanged. Similar comments
>for trillOamMepPtrEgressPortIdSubtype and trillOamMepPtrEgressPortId.
>Note that syntax is also stated in the Entry definition and has to be
>fixed there, too.
>
>6) Same problem as 5) for the corresponding trillOamMtvrTable objects.
>
>7) Security Considerations, third para, first-to-second lines:
>s/MAC-ACCESS/MAX-ACCESS/