[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Wed, 26 October 2016 09:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E2C12940F for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qyWDdW1Fbpal for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E381200DF for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id z190so3054953qkc.2 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=oS6E2cMqTxwvj3968FwcCa31JkxcRIGMHGGrLAdRPuc=; b=A/jOPuIS0panVv1U5UAoTiwrhukSIVl7SlwI51WCrjo+UchRuntYWNoq9SIup0E3bm /Wn3ORL/aOjPHDLhY6MGGk9SQpEr/+AxIFD2d6wgyN8cs7IHyaaVZnPJx7soJgNu61fK fNtVdXGOQIPK3I+749/4hIFaLpqNFDPV606WbZH5ZAgVD6QCqa/j4nYM07+9SuuSROhG /zsJxg2/tcFZuKi8eI5b5aaZwFfppqd1pbHtAwVwGsNz5zxTcJ75kLLBtC6jIarLIcSa Z5AoZwxqVJSb3ileyAT4/85OWFpyfI6sz/3H60R8p4SlgAfJwQR+r64rDMsHuCmzi4IC VQzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=oS6E2cMqTxwvj3968FwcCa31JkxcRIGMHGGrLAdRPuc=; b=P8RIRPtFxRbgEozfFYOWV7+druOZycVd8b712iij2bhQmmhXtaEphmWikRulomgqOq 3lNh3PVOsjZsP1z1A8BLrUgz9Pdo1Xiw5YtW4b2cpeJh6OHjefqKevPMt3F1LSjmRCyw ex8YXg8l0IvvUn8WDUIKQgRzQJBUmQ6scu2q89wpy+09Bou4jCUDfhycSQs1Hl5Xxq4q MrqnZgj+Awfp/vjK4RFaZjKyq30mNHMqxbhsQJcyJquhJSm9KrtwKvQiU3ZQ4+0hKpG2 LlWXNX6TM1vet+DFSTsLc8E4tNcnSpzWzLx0HwtGy/2OrhLxtEHlW9G2oW8pFNr0lVyM /WSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcDkUJwsPj0eMPGWsKMYWxAvXEcFHevbsHuR4DNrErfs8D5Hyd2f2HoNsDpEuKFklGNQSGLBP3Ktg1FYw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id q184mr628717qkb.94.1477475947567; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:59:06 +0300
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4UMNCbACqJ8C0yn6H8piPzuEfRxgmr4Z4RZxfeVEa72dQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e632804e0d3053fc1ad37"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/uquKmXYKppTHiuZEhvTJLvBi8Cw>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:59:10 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 10/26/16
IETF LC End Date: 8/10/16
IESG Telechat date: 10/28/16


The more important issue in my initial review was clarified in draft-14.
Two minor issues were not, but these are not essential.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

1.       The use of B – ‘Both’ terminology used to indicate that an
attribute is specified S – Session Level and M – Medial Level (e.g. in
Section 5) may be confusing, as there is a third possible level SR – Source
Level. Actually S + M would probably be more clear.

2. Section 5.54 includes a note referring to the TBD content. ‘As per
section 9.1 of [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation],  there exists no
publicly available specification that defines procedures for
multiplexing/demultiplexing fax protocols flows over a single 5-tuple.
Once such a specification is available, the multiplexing category
assignments for the attributes in this section could be revisited.’
Assuming the missing specification will be publicly available sometime in
the future – how will this information be added? Revise this RFC? The
question applies to other TBD marked in the ‘Mux Category’ column of the
tables in Section 5 (in 5.42, 5.44, …)

Nits/editorial comments: