[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14

[Dan Romascanu <[e-mail]>]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 10/26/16
IETF LC End Date: 8/10/16
IESG Telechat date: 10/28/16

Summary:
Ready.

The more important issue in my initial review was clarified in draft-14.
Two minor issues were not, but these are not essential.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

1.       The use of B – ‘Both’ terminology used to indicate that an
attribute is specified S – Session Level and M – Medial Level (e.g. in
Section 5) may be confusing, as there is a third possible level SR – Source
Level. Actually S + M would probably be more clear.

2. Section 5.54 includes a note referring to the TBD content. ‘As per
section 9.1 of [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation],  there exists no
publicly available specification that defines procedures for
multiplexing/demultiplexing fax protocols flows over a single 5-tuple.
Once such a specification is available, the multiplexing category
assignments for the attributes in this section could be revisited.’
Assuming the missing specification will be publicly available sometime in
the future – how will this information be added? Revise this RFC? The
question applies to other TBD marked in the ‘Mux Category’ column of the
tables in Section 5 (in 5.42, 5.44, …)

Nits/editorial comments:


Regards,

Dan