IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 30 August 2016 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81D812D7F1; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6h0o-1AAS7ay; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B65EC12D7FA; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id fi15so10241660pac.1; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OHsQ4s1vjzJyLt9QeFAlAB/JRTKMW1LMhTsKRI+t1M0=; b=FlOhQHurt77xOHARw9/2u/Jp0D2XTbBQzPML/DKJgBf5P7JdPUo73PGDlNpzLEG2bt mMl1Ol2yt7Iwnv/HM8OuAoYdPlDledxToXVO7AyPTKGGteznMbllTzi2hTmO/L9AL9C6 z807LzwZdksg2hdjHztJYP61IrkCmfp6QyDjyW0BU2DtbiM7jm1jznW4hVUugBbXaVey t5ofmywzL/UTRaEciKSNz3pK+BfgYUJJielsj5EHV2GZro5VnTgVQpYyL7GZDsDuaqyb +rXm6vGehjLWq9XZOoqJvKuVZrhwnRN+nygyZa31MIdYL+FcIZamHoePCGghkP6vp3s/ ZT6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OHsQ4s1vjzJyLt9QeFAlAB/JRTKMW1LMhTsKRI+t1M0=; b=jPrrPfm5iXwzz9iOVuzVn+pdNoKrjj5cRInkgG3aqKMaJ3t3Ac0QeXBxiBEe5sugpQ rAwDJ8t1xY+cQ7vfBDrTZ9pAw9bedyBYKYrzKKuDeADIiXVtNzYwh+bkHbgZ+i9Ggpu9 o62mCvdW8Ufg9FCstgGRdi3DmsEk+l2c3ps/e3VttTrQ3aZEA8l+sH3+6bv56iq4rAQv zaNHzPodlAiQJHZaUlPyvzysXipjLe1s/ISKMIyqHm+/5EnsTwo1BxXXcPjpWKzwBKC+ 6Ukag4zxgo8p488bi7Gp8PLkmsSpN7vGYjvd8V1QShOgMcIZnw0DI/M41bYsWhgNHUef Q61g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPiSFjMAjOM9V1+scXxYDQtia+WHLnFvE8dEx7dVLaa5RWNC25V4blybQP8AkVvIw==
X-Received: by 10.66.76.38 with SMTP id h6mr9085344paw.79.1472584717007; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.16.65.127] ([216.31.219.19]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g27sm59054292pfd.47.2016.08.30.12.18.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
References: <90ba9146-5aeb-9471-e855-c9a57f329ec1@gmail.com> <9604F2C5-3A0F-40F4-85EF-E714D87357F1@fenron.com>
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@fenron.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <67c7c988-c4ab-0ca3-496c-edb6315392da@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:18:18 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9604F2C5-3A0F-40F4-85EF-E714D87357F1@fenron.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/v4ZhSngCEKxEUUNGXPq-c-1nwQM>
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jouni.nospam@gmail.com
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 19:18:42 -0000

see inline.

8/29/2016, 2:45 PM, Bill Fenner kirjoitti:
> On Aug 29, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
>> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>>
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01
>> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
>> Review Date: 8/29/2016
>> IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-24
>> IESG Telechat date: 2016-09-01
>>
>> Summary: Ready with nits. Note. I did not run these MIBs through
>>  any verification tools.
>>
>> Major issues: None.
>>
>> Minor issues:
>> * The document does not pass IDnits. The only complaint of IDnits that
>>  I am concerned of is:
>>  "** The document seems to lack an Introduction section."
>>
>>  Anyway, if Motivation section is considered equivalent to
>>  Introduction section then I am fine and the IDnits complaints
>>  can be neglected all together.
>
> That was my intention.

Ok. WFM if it also works for others in the publication process.

>> * Other MIB modules than IPV6-TC has in each their DESCRIPTIONs
>>  text saying by what it was obsoleted. Unless I am missing something
>>  here (that justifies the absence of disclaimers) I would like to see
>>  similar text in each IPV6-TC DESCRIPTION as well.
>
> I overlooked that RFC2579 actually requires the same thing for textual conventions as RFC2578 requires for object revisions. Thanks for catching this.

Good.

- Jouni

>
>
>   Bill
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status