Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-geojson-03

Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> Thu, 02 June 2016 16:32 UTC

From: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
To: Tim Schaub <tim.schaub@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-geojson-03
Thread-Index: AdG8V9eclfZmUCgVSzaM32I3B/L2jAAZyumAAAtPfIA=
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 16:31:56 +0000
Message-ID: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A489792C1@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A48977FE0@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <CAKdrn+fwdXbQ3F-+DAhFsTFaKU0d70aoTe0B4jwLG=jeLWuBBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKdrn+fwdXbQ3F-+DAhFsTFaKU0d70aoTe0B4jwLG=jeLWuBBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/v5_08WmgP6PtfnqgOmMLC9QyZEM>
Cc: "draft-ietf-geojson.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-geojson.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-geojson-03
Precedence: list

Hi,
  Thank you.

Best,
Meral

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Schaub [mailto:tim.schaub@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 12:08 AM
> To: Meral Shirazipour
> Cc: draft-ietf-geojson.all@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-geojson-03
> 
> Thanks for the comments Meral.  I've proposed
> https://github.com/geojson/draft-geojson/pull/208 to incorporate them.
> Responses below ...
> 
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Meral Shirazipour
> <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > -[Page 3], "any thing"--typo-->"anything"
> 
> I *think* the original text was meant to emphasize "thing", but it ends up
> sounding awkward to me.  I think we should go with "anything"
> if others agree.
> 
> > -[Page 4], KML not spelled out at first use (Keyhole Markup Language?)
> 
> Done.
> 
> > -[Page 11],PIDF-LO, please spell out at first use and maybe reference
> > RFC5139.
> 
> Done.  But see below ...
> 
> > -[Page 11], it says
> >
> > "Applications such as PIDF-LO that are sensitive to location
> >
> >    uncertainty and confidence might treat ...
> >
> > "
> >
> > Not clear: if this is not an OK behavior, it should say "should not
> > treat..."? If this is an ok behavior, maybe it should say "MAY treat ..."
> 
> I agree that this paragraph might add confusion.  I think the section on
> Uncertainty and Confidence would be clearer if the whole paragraph were
> removed.
> 
> > -[Page 12], "in the the case"---typo-->"in the case"
> 
> Good catch.  There were three of these.
> 
> > -[Page 12], "the OGC's "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84"
> > [OGCURL]. "
> >
> > Should the URL  be moved to reference section?
> 
> Since http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84 is a URN, I don't think it
> makes sense to include in the reference section.  It would be nice if it resolved to
> something useful so it could serve as a reference though.
> 
> > -[Page 13], "or to to have"--typo-->"or to have"
> 
> Changed.
> 
> > -[Page 16], "the the semantics"--typo-->"the semantics"
> 
> Also changed.
> 
> > -[Page 18], "can not be"---->"cannot be"
> 
> Done.
> 
> Tim
> 
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Meral
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Meral Shirazipour
> >
> > Ericsson Research
> >
> > www.ericsson.com

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-i… Meral Shirazipour
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of dra… Tim Schaub
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of dra… Tim Schaub
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of dra… Jari Arkko
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of dra… Meral Shirazipour