IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Thu, 31 May 2012 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1CB11E8074 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PcjN2JjmPndX for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A9111E8072 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=eckelcu@cisco.com; l=2128; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1338497513; x=1339707113; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=M2NdYdQyKl8a8tUcUNpZNz4THwzjax5GZeHElf6ztVA=; b=IyTArcjTKFRu/l3h7eRaIm5pKGSLbuX5rnsZz0eBvjSYPrNhksX3/32d Rtj4DTZe1L+66AGm+x+CfCuRIvEXDhkO5R+k8gwvNVlk3RQidE9fWlYlx Cwh+JOZDuiMsJEOV8i7duQCaRGrlmZ5LsrhetGwULC5yUFM9JdIEjdkL0 c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAHbZx0+rRDoH/2dsb2JhbAA7CbQVgQeCGAEBAQQSAR0KPwwEAgEIEQMBAQELBhcBBgFFCQgBAQQBEggBGYdoAQuZAZ9TixERCYRMYAOIQI1njH6BZoMAgT8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,693,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="44602507"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2012 20:51:53 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4VKpqYH010350; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:51:52 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.111]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 31 May 2012 13:51:52 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:51:51 -0700
Message-ID: <E1CBF4C7095A3D4CAAAEAD09FBB8E08C07386A45@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FC7D2D2.9060008@bell-labs.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
Thread-Index: Ac0/ajpu7gQIXgg0Q5SXaGSE6vtsLgABJjHw
References: <4FC7D2D2.9060008@bell-labs.com>
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>, draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity@tools.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2012 20:51:52.0585 (UTC) FILETIME=[34F2A790:01CD3F6F]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:52:59 -0700
Cc: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:51:53 -0000

Hi Vijay,

Thank you for your review. I agree with your comment. It was actually
one of the WGLC comments:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg00395.html

This comment in particular seems to have fallen through the cracks.
Thanks for catching it.

Cheers,
Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:vkg@bell-labs.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 1:22 PM
> To: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: General Area Review Team; Charles Eckel (eckelcu); Shida Schubert;
> Gonzalo Camarillo
> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
> Review Date: May-31-2012
> IETF LC End Date: June-14-2012
> IESG Telechat date: Not known
> 
> Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard; it has one minor
> comment that should be fixed before publication.
> 
> Major: 0
> Minor: 1
> Nits: 0
> 
> Minor:
> 
> - In S6, the text says that "... the use of security mechanisms with
>   RTP, as documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] SHOULD apply."
> 
>   I am puzzled by the normative language here.  Won't it be more
proper
>   to simply say that "... the use of security mechanisms with RTP, as
>   documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] apply."
> 
>   The use of SHOULD seem to indicate that there are certain cases
>   during measurement reporting where the security considerations do
not
>   apply.  Surely you do not mean that, do you?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email