[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 26 November 2019 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783CC120B02; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:47:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.111.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <157480843342.13609.14136034204321908736@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:47:13 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/wRKBioW78JuFE2tmKiYxcz3JXHI>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:47:13 -0000

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2019-11-26
IETF LC End Date: 2019-12-16
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready for publication as a BCP but with nits to consider during the
approval process

Nits:

Neither the document nor the shepherds write-up acknowledge or explain the
replacement of RFC6838 with RFC3986 for a reference for specifying fragment
identifier syntax and semantics (hence dropping the reference to 6838). It
would be nice to have something captured in the record that supports/explains
this change.

Near that change, there is a typo, currently saying "fragment identiers'
syntax" (should be "identifiers'")

It might be good to capture in the "Note to Readers" that the RFC Editor should
also remove Section 6.3 (URIs) since all the references to them will be removed
with the removal of this Note.