[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Thu, 21 March 2013 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8545421F8DB9; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.414
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYFP9uCgyvrt; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1D221F8CDD; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF271C003D; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [] (pool-70-106-135-233.clppva.east.verizon.net []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 283C71C0812; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <514B808F.3050203@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:50:07 -0400
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>, draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech@tools.ietf.org
References: <4F6BB53A.3070609@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F6BB53A.3070609@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:50:24 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt
	Flow Selection Techniques
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 21-March-2013
IETF LC End Date: 1-April-2013
IESG Telechat date: N/A

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a proposed standard.

Major issues: none (the previous major issue has been resolved by 
revision.  Thank you.)

Minor issues:
	The tracker does not indicate a document shepherd for this document.

	If compliance is a big issue, then this document seems under-specified. 
For example, it says in section 5.1 "In order to be compliant with this 
document, at least the Property Match Filtering MUST be implemented." 
However, Property Match Filtering as defined in section 5.1.1 is a range 
of behaviors, so it is unclear which property tests must be supported 
(any, all possible?) in order to be compliant.

Nits/editorial comments: None