Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 19 August 2015 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A0A1AD35F; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9mbqDqZPGTeL; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAF2D1ACEB1; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2468; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1439994957; x=1441204557; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rGW+ywr6KGLLK64dvy2xjCT2OXztLNvxaQ4ADnY7MSw=; b=XxkCe0QENm6PmhMJSn8J/L2wdTG1Vzi1+LXGDN104nXzVjjSMymHYIwq 20+v+0LyyqriyyrzvsNWhAT2JmyNEVvCMLz9ilZLXpuW9fQS46hmn9Rm1 7WufGHsBiAeeZ1QLlwjek8e40qzYnSzIyXr1drYSFNzJidah5UT8QDKK/ o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AhBQDwk9RV/4cNJK1dgxtUaQaDH7ovgXmFeQIcgSQ5EwEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEEIxFVAgEIGAICJgICAjAVEAIEARIJiCUNuleWIQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBG4EiijGEbyKCaYFDBZUkAYxsgUqUf4NoJoN9cQGBR4EEAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,710,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="25554147"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Aug 2015 14:35:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (xch-aln-007.cisco.com [173.36.7.17]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7JEZuSQ009659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:35:56 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) by XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:35:55 -0500
Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (173.36.12.86) by xch-aln-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:35:55 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.223]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:35:54 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQ2m08pHezg0kRTXmNmM5Vd6JL2J4TdKAA
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:35:54 +0000
Message-ID: <D1FA0C15.2BF53%acee@cisco.com>
References: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF63A8CE253@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <D1F9CDB4.2BE8E%acee@cisco.com> <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF63A8CE8BC@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF63A8CE8BC@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.37.102.24]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <447C3C2CC61D9644B3BCD3EA9E35383F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/waqhgsjFD1DSJTKan8DErstZIV8>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:36:01 -0000

Hi Suresh, 

On 8/19/15, 10:31 AM, "Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
wrote:

>Hi Acee,
>   I checked out the changes in the new version (12) and they look good.
>Thanks a lot for taking care of the changes. Only one pending comment
>from me. I will send in a new review.
>
>On 08/19/2015 06:53 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>>> * IANA Considerations
>>>
>>> * The Opaque LSA Options types used by this document (7 & 8) seem to be
>>> wrongly entered into the IANA registry and are pointing to
>>> [draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions] instead of this draft. It
>>> is probably worth taking this up during the IANA check.
>>
>> No - these values do correspond to segment routing. This draft is a
>> prerequisite that defines the OSPF extension mechanisms and creates the
>> registry.
>
>I leave this to your discretion, but the IANA registry usually points to
>the draft that defined the values and
>draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions *does not* seem to be
>defining them.
>
>Just to be very precise these are the values that I am talking about
>
>"
>    This specification updates the Opaque Link-State Advertisements (LSA)
>    Option Types with the following values:
>
>    o  7 (IANA Early Allocation [RFC7120]) - OSPFv2 Extended Prefix
>       Opaque LSA
>
>    o  8 (IANA Early Allocation [RFC7120]) - OSPFv2 Extended Link Opaque
>       LSA

Right - at one time these extensions were part of the OSPF SR draft. We
split them out and made them generic. I’ll alert them along with the new
OSPFv2 Prefix TLV Flags registry.

Thanks,
Acee 




>"
>
>and this is the IANA registry in question
>
>http://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-opaque-types/ospf-opaque-types.xhtml#
>ospf-opaque-types-2
>
>Cheers
>Suresh