Re: [Gen-art] [regext] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 15 October 2019 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C626212007C; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.172, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nw7Q0TOdwCVQ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com [209.85.166.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7264D120046; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id v2so48313993iob.10; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w4Bng/bAfMzeO3ivJl8VsB6tNyop27/HtJdxrA9QYXg=; b=oqPwFIQNXJeeiuLhGQsRn63GRdlnBO4kRqAOuzQtFes/qPa0H1C6ZQsc7LROkaP5z+ H2Ijm2ZVh8Vo8f4jS4Xo3KCbsKwiWg5dbqulTKyvhf9ItJrHvV5S2MzjNmNzLnXO2dDg n65bGKNvE9acbKlAOKc7og85Fj2NZelwHw0r6DZ3ITd/yX00mCjXgN1Hl+buz2yhiMuE rzV8Vl7MXtFM+Ek0qD8FWagX3ZnDuWvCitXSKomG0hA8yqrMNP2x4nR4iRKKHdQgbjNW 6ZsU4PkgxPYeJ5ZuOUEoBydt0FHgLDVbkNsNhWaoqNHaNCPcR9+joIQphNNnXzPPVX6N raVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVIQeZk7aEVqDnh6/Ln4NobFOy8Lcz1TcfD7nDoojJiT9OReVvJ jjeFLYk4BLSjA+IpOuBmobTLgM1pR9gefweJ+8tuQv/4
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzGnm79HmIfKZc/aRTMstIaY/xBbKTwkr0TNRm3QMM4CJpG4yoMe5xtz+1ZGMBKbDE05gs7EcrZ1LT5ivYEVMA=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:490f:: with SMTP id w15mr7511955ila.187.1571164429470; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157074817849.20459.11318968277639852496@ietfa.amsl.com> <754e85cd.1470.16dce6a353a.Coremail.yaojk@cnnic.cn> <cffa265b-5df3-fdea-f57a-7af30880a154@joelhalpern.com> <5D394E0244700A5D092F1181@PSB> <c32157cf-3b18-fd01-9f0d-29bd6f4d4645@joelhalpern.com> <CALaySJLpf63gG811=az6oEfSV4hu20KDJn_rSXJ=gZQQ+OKsZw@mail.gmail.com> <e98f8b98-c6e2-a290-57d4-79e60dde49b0@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <e98f8b98-c6e2-a290-57d4-79e60dde49b0@joelhalpern.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:33:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+mFkf18jouy_jyE7nsB8yKKQMg7bfL0P1gpUmCgAQV0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration.all" <draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration.all@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, regext <regext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/wu5GOqvI7UYQDt06Y2HV3Njpcdw>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [regext] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:33:52 -0000

> If I think about it too much, I end up unable to parse the notion of a
> document published on the IETF stream without IETF rough consensus.

And yet they are there today and will continue to be.

b