IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt

Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 26 November 2014 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761EE1A874B for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:44:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qHV_4tpLXMhr for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:44:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C90D1A7113 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:44:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m8so1393359obr.41 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:44:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8VBrIUwy8hvykTE2NiB8epZQwilsNcz9XbzZ131zuYg=; b=rAt90hjiO5D2jactxRxm3TM/eIF22Xrio9Ra0EbTrSM322YSy9ZppmKVlhVPt14KWM nFmj7Hx3eLUwsIWSw+8u0IK0UDCDkK2STjJmFrtQEGGOBmMW8jvmH2D3BjwlMG/534mt 9s57mys1dCPC6GoJKUDZFg9nA8l2jnpIlkRTts6nm8z+XjDQ/Zeh/vBWfVntr+vl/Aff iYs9Mu4dSxMv8dlOVNvvFsgKH65K3C9aKs1NkfNZdprydYxjlnXcUY0DerOS0Xbqs0Z0 QARhQ8lLmSfCHf34CO5oaYelbc3Q3VO4MlUmA7hFXxGg+1pstMUHPXaD53WV+3jBvGo4 bhtA==
X-Received: by 10.60.157.71 with SMTP id wk7mr17446790oeb.65.1416962663560; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2605:6000:9004:ce00:a8ad:e147:5684:ad3c? ([2605:6000:9004:ce00:a8ad:e147:5684:ad3c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ry5sm1160648obb.28.2014.11.25.16.44.21 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:44:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54752264.6020103@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:44:20 -0600
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <53DAB481.6080709@nostrum.com> <53DE8F7B.6040309@isode.com> <ADE718DA-7071-43EE-B0A4-7A1EF77D4124@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <ADE718DA-7071-43EE-B0A4-7A1EF77D4124@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/xE4qy6EkwMNsQxjMmeW0SJ0SPgg
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:44:27 -0000

On 11/25/2014 09:50 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Thanks for the review. (Were the comments adopted by the authors? This review is from August, but I cannot see a response…)

So, just to update the RMCAT crew, this document was approved on today's 
telechat, pending comment disposition.

On the comments from Alexey's review - the term RMCAT doesn't appear in 
the text, but still appears in the short title on each page, so his 
comment on expanding/explaining RMCAT still applies. RTP and RTCP now do 
have references, so that comment has been handled.

In addition, there were IESG evaluation comments from several ADs. The 
comments from Brian and Barry were intended for me and the other ADs, so 
no action required, but the other comments at 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements/ballot/ should 
be considered. You should bask for a moment in the compliment Ted 
included in his ballot.

Please let me know if/when you have a revised ID, and I'll send the 
approval note to the secretariat.

And thanks for all your work on this.

Spencer, as responsible AD

> Jari
>
> On 03 Aug 2014, at 21:37, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05
>> Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
>> Review Date: 3-Aug-2014
>> IETF LC End Date: 13-Aug-2014
>> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>>
>> Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC [ready with comments]
>>
>> Major issues: None
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> In Section 1: RMCAT is not explained/expanded, when mentioned for the first time. Does this acronym need to be in the published RFC, e.g. would it be useful for readers reading this document 10 years later?
>>
>> RTP and RTCP need references.
>>
>> In general, I found this document not to be very friendly to people who don't follow RMCAT.
>>
>> Nits/editorial comments: None
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status