[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-12

["Miguel A. Garcia" <[e-mail]>]

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you 
may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-12
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[e-mail]>
Review Date: 2011-10-18
IETF LC End Date: 2011-10-20
IESG Telechat date: 2011-10-20

Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standards track RFC.

Major issues: none

Minor issues: none

Nits/editorial comments:

- Section 3.4 reads:

    Section 2.1.1 of [RFC5322] limits lines to 998 characters and
    recommends that the lines be restricted to only 78 characters.  This
    specification changes the former limit to 988 octets.
           bbb                                ^^^

I wonder if there is an error in the third line and the text should say 
"... limit to 998 octets" rather than "988". Otherwise, I can't explain 
the 988 figure.


Idnits has a number of complaints:

   Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist :
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

   -- The draft header indicates that this document obsoletes RFC5335,
but the abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.

   -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC2045, but
the abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.

   -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC5322, but 
the abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.

   Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

   ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational draft:
      draft-ietf-eai-frmwrk-4952bis (ref. 'I-D.ietf-eai-frmwrk-4952bis')

   ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 5598



Other than that, the document looks good.

/Miguel


-- 
Miguel A. Garcia
[phone]
Ericsson Spain