[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 04 April 2012 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC91721F8795; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eYGKjYCr7y1o; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (cl-125.lon-03.gb.sixxs.net [IPv6:2a00:14f0:e000:7c::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA04421F876E; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1333559336; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=lJ0YeMTqy8d0Egzm7PDcbVBBLUJn5bvqAPDzNo/6KRg=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=ATpjBiTFIxgY3u84fda3YSVGSJpzPWma4lo0MJrq66HB52vgUUuO34aykvGDEW+R3E2Av3 Qg2DCG9pjW1hG8RADWr4KV2BvByyrfk/kxP4O8kf+z0FxZtpNCExHedBiRcBWCn7pT8/K1 vQhGJW9e6hCs4fSDn2OGJWQzDPDN2Lg=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <T3yAJwAk6SnJ@rufus.isode.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:08:56 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
Message-ID: <4F7C803F.2040308@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:09:19 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>, Richard Woundy <richard_woundy@cable.comcast.com>, Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:09:00 -0000

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ 
at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
Review Date: 2012-04-04
IETF LC End Date: 2012-04-12
IESG Review: 2012-04-12

Summary: The document is nearly ready for publication as an 
Informational RFC (see one issue below)


Major issues: none

Minor issues:

This might be pedantic, but I think some of your Informational 
references are actually Normative, because they are needed to understand 
the document. See "IESG Statement: Normative and Informative References" 
for more details 
<http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/normative-informative.html>.

This almost doesn't matter for an Informational document, however if any 
of 5 drafts becomes Normative, publication of this document as an RFC 
will be delayed. Still, this might be better than just getting it 
published with "work in progress" references.

But otherwise this is a well written document and I enjoyed reading it.


Nits/editorial comments: none