Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2016-07-08
"A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com> Tue, 12 July 2016 17:20 UTC
Return-Path: <mahoney@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1613E12D780 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ATenAWt9DBVt for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1980B12D544 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mutabilis-2.local ([173.57.161.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u6CHJk49067069 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:19:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mahoney@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [173.57.161.14] claimed to be mutabilis-2.local
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
References: <432ad668-ceec-3244-22ed-efcc4ca785fe@nostrum.com> <454acea0-d35b-5dad-36c0-40853192c8d5@gmail.com>
From: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <b68ed35e-6cd3-140b-2cb7-09c612aec7c9@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:19:46 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <454acea0-d35b-5dad-36c0-40853192c8d5@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/yV-0p4HOOu_S9PQ9dg1VUBWxw8g>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2016-07-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:20:02 -0000
The deadline for all LCs listed below has been extended to 2016-08-01 Thanks! Jean On 7/9/16 2:26 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Last Calls ending in the middle of an IETF week? > > Hate to say this, but my review is not going to happen on that timescale. > I thought that the IESG policy was never to issue Last Calls on top of > an IETF week. > > Brian > > On 09/07/2016 07:47, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The following reviewers have assignments: >> >> Reviewer LC end Draft >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Brian Carpenter 2016-07-21 draft-ietf-clue-datachannel-13 >> >> Christer Holmberg 2016-07-21 >> draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard-02 >> >> Wassim Haddad * 2016-07-21 draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-14 >> >> >> >> I have made the assignments in the review tool: >> http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/ >> >> And the assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: >> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html >> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html >> >> The updated template is included below. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jean >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >> like any other last call comments. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: >> Reviewer: >> Review Date: >> IETF LC End Date: >> IESG Telechat date: (if known) >> >> Summary: >> >> Major issues: >> >> Minor issues: >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> Gen-art@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art >
- Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - … Brian E Carpenter
- [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2016… A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - … A. Jean Mahoney