IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-ir-04

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 17 August 2016 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2347812D608; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yf3iXt7gW_wp; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BAB12D5D0; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE2E2CCB3; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 23:12:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RTGQCLlAcPus; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 23:12:01 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B712CC9C; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 23:12:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C7B1FDF4-CD49-485E-AD45-3D4234F16D95"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <9a5e6cf6-96d3-018b-1231-fd2b946712ec@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:10:53 +0200
Message-Id: <13B85175-6744-42CE-9349-383CF8B732BE@piuha.net>
References: <4f4583c1-bd58-b5e7-09dc-7dc062d7ef9e@alum.mit.edu> <9a5e6cf6-96d3-018b-1231-fd2b946712ec@juniper.net>
To: Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/yWf3JQu8NFqyQpcM3Tl9QhOAEBw>
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-ir.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-ir-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 20:12:04 -0000

Folks,

I don’t know what to do with this draft.

I’ve read the draft, prompted by Paul’s review. While I can understand most of what it says, I have to say it is a very difficult read. Probably due to the large complex system that it is a part of. But, I’ve been thoroughly unable to convince myself for instance that the draft covers all cases in the functionality that it describes.

I will check with my AD colleagues on how they perceived the document, and if they have any guidance on this matter. Stay tuned.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email