Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06

[Qin Wu <[e-mail]>]

Done, thank for your reminding.
Diff:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-07

Regards!
-Qin WU
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gonzalo Camarillo" <[e-mail]>
To: "Qin Wu" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[e-mail]>; "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; "General Area Review Team" <[e-mail]>; "Shida Schubert" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06


> Authors,
> 
> at this point (the IETF LC is over), could you please revise the draft
> in order to address Vijay's comment?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> On 01/06/2012 4:27 AM, Qin Wu wrote:
>> Agree, Thanks!
>> 
>> Regards!
>> -Qin
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[e-mail]>
>> To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>
>> Cc: "General Area Review Team" <[e-mail]>; "Shida Schubert" <[e-mail]>; "Gonzalo Camarillo" <[e-mail]>
>> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 4:51 AM
>> Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Vijay,
>> 
>> Thank you for your review. I agree with your comment. It was actually
>> one of the WGLC comments:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg00395.html
>> 
>> This comment in particular seems to have fallen through the cracks.
>> Thanks for catching it.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Charles
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 1:22 PM
>>> To: [e-mail]
>>> Cc: General Area Review Team; Charles Eckel (eckelcu); Shida Schubert;
>>> Gonzalo Camarillo
>>> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
>>>
>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>>
>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>>> you may receive.
>>>
>>> Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
>>> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
>>> Review Date: May-31-2012
>>> IETF LC End Date: June-14-2012
>>> IESG Telechat date: Not known
>>>
>>> Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard; it has one minor
>>> comment that should be fixed before publication.
>>>
>>> Major: 0
>>> Minor: 1
>>> Nits: 0
>>>
>>> Minor:
>>>
>>> - In S6, the text says that "... the use of security mechanisms with
>>>   RTP, as documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] SHOULD apply."
>>>
>>>   I am puzzled by the normative language here.  Won't it be more
>> proper
>>>   to simply say that "... the use of security mechanisms with RTP, as
>>>   documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] apply."
>>>
>>>   The use of SHOULD seem to indicate that there are certain cases
>>>   during measurement reporting where the security considerations do
>> not
>>>   apply.  Surely you do not mean that, do you?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> - vijay
>>> --
>>> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
>>> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
>>> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [e-mail]
>>> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>> 
> 
>