[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Thu, 31 May 2012 20:16 UTC
Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1009421F844E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pIZh55K+gAUn for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6229921F8570 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.10]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q4VKG9F4017686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 31 May 2012 15:16:10 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q4VKG8gf026602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 May 2012 15:16:08 -0500
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.237.229]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id q4VKG7Om011073; Thu, 31 May 2012 15:16:07 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4FC7D2D2.9060008@bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 15:21:38 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.10
Cc: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, eckelcu@cisco.com, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:16:19 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: May-31-2012 IETF LC End Date: June-14-2012 IESG Telechat date: Not known Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard; it has one minor comment that should be fixed before publication. Major: 0 Minor: 1 Nits: 0 Minor: - In S6, the text says that "... the use of security mechanisms with RTP, as documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] SHOULD apply." I am puzzled by the normative language here. Won't it be more proper to simply say that "... the use of security mechanisms with RTP, as documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] apply." The use of SHOULD seem to indicate that there are certain cases during measurement reporting where the security considerations do not apply. Surely you do not mean that, do you? Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rt… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrbloc… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrbloc… Qin Wu
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrbloc… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrbloc… Qin Wu
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrbloc… Gonzalo Camarillo