IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-04

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 20 October 2022 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701EFC14F74B; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXUUsIBTroI4; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768A7C14F74D; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:f1db:6c8d:4bb0:23a7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 147D71DCAD8; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:43:23 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1666259003; bh=lJ3ssSUEG4kVFDKCTw+KJXe3dJQNOHsUT5RFLf/Bi+A=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=SqQxrxefTfmWsjFSzv99HDzKpDJbtU2iv4x8iuo4jFApH+shT7JHCbhAdiU2tMxod hmdjBS6kIrBa0bEHBVQ8oFBDnXB5VMg13TW2WAUSY/uXQtaXemwARG24nKYZ1WoTHX 9Ye151SjwOPuwFJQUGeIkJ+DD1TMD87ZJS+j67SI=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_768CA271-9D8C-43D1-BE75-94470DFADD95"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <166380060147.12969.9531587454280474028@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:43:19 +0300
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs.all@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Message-Id: <9824EC75-BA75-4F68-A84C-E653D512AAD0@eggert.org>
References: <166380060147.12969.9531587454280474028@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 147D71DCAD8.A7F0E
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/z-pTOjJgKshqt4Rqx4kLZKxc7oo>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:43:35 -0000

Joel, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document based on my own review.

Lars


> On 2022-9-22, at 1:50, Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-04
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 2022-09-21
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-04
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: Assuming a reasonable answer to one question, this document is ready
> for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
> 
> Major issues:
>    The one question I have is "why?"  I could not find anywhere in the
>    document any explanation of why we are defining an SNMP MIB for monitoring
>    ipsecme, nor the equivalent why an operator would choose to use this MIB
>    instead of the YANG based model that it is based upon.
> 
> Minor issues: N/A
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: N/A
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email