Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-info-03
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 14 May 2012 19:52 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954D321F88D0 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.313
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.313 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.288, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W5XGNiROVG0T for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A6B21F85D1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-123.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4EJq6VS080330 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 14 May 2012 14:52:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <02d501cd3209$f4e1ddf0$dea599d0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:52:22 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <38397590-FB4B-43B6-A6AF-08F0D97B0181@nostrum.com>
References: <6D18CD1E-FBB8-43F7-8D82-46667AA2075B@nostrum.com> <02d501cd3209$f4e1ddf0$dea599d0$@olddog.co.uk>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-info.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-info-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:52:08 -0000
On May 14, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Thanks Ben. > > All entered as RFC Editor notes except the last one... > > >> -- 2.2, paragraph 5: "... definition of the Association ID, which is (quoting >> [RFC4872]):" >> >> The quoted text this refers to is more of a description of use than a > definition. > > I agree, but don't think any change is needed. The full text here is... > > They > also share the same definition of the Association ID, which is > (quoting [RFC4872]): > > "The Association ID MUST be set to the LSP ID of the LSP being > protected by this LSP or the LSP protecting this LSP. If unknown, > this value is set to its own signaled LSP ID value (default). > Also, the value of the Association ID MAY change during the > lifetime of the LSP." > > Thus "which is" means "and here is a description". > > If you feel really strongly we can probably work something out. No problem at all. It was pedantic enough that I almost didn't include it :-)
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-a… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-cca… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-cca… Ben Campbell