Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-info-03

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

On May 14, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

> Thanks Ben.
> 
> All entered as RFC Editor notes except the last one...
> 
> 
>> -- 2.2, paragraph 5: "... definition of the Association ID, which is (quoting
>> [RFC4872]):"
>> 
>> The quoted text this refers to is more of a description of use than a
> definition.
> 
> I agree, but don't think any change is needed. The full text here is...
> 
>   They
>   also share the same definition of the Association ID, which is
>   (quoting [RFC4872]):
> 
>      "The Association ID MUST be set to the LSP ID of the LSP being
>      protected by this LSP or the LSP protecting this LSP.  If unknown,
>      this value is set to its own signaled LSP ID value (default).
>      Also, the value of the Association ID MAY change during the
>      lifetime of the LSP."
> 
> Thus "which is" means "and here is a description".
> 
> If you feel really strongly we can probably work something out. 

No problem at all. It was pedantic enough that I almost didn't include it :-)