IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry-02

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 15 October 2015 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1241B30E9 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sb3Hc3BtkxQC for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E967B1B30EA for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BD92CCBE; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:37:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GX-w-5WpIhQc; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:37:37 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3432CC6B; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:37:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_88210F50-3856-4A80-80AE-9360686616D9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-eMd-zsF3+K3th+vvZDAtMuaRBjepoGOp7RpFd0qjKZxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:37:35 +0300
Message-Id: <17B8A024-DA3C-452E-9DF1-FFEB7DF4E1E0@piuha.net>
References: <03e701d0eb90$32d0d830$98728890$@gmail.com> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D0BB4580F7F@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com> <CAKKJt-eMd-zsF3+K3th+vvZDAtMuaRBjepoGOp7RpFd0qjKZxg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/zEVNTJn3pdXDd3V7gj3RjvcY408>
Cc: gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry.all@tools.ietf.org>, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:37:44 -0000

Indeed thank you for the review. And it was a good question.

Jari

On 11 Sep 2015, at 16:33, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, Roni,
> 
> Thank you for the review - it's always helpful ...
> 
> Spencer
> 
> On Sep 10, 2015 16:35, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Roni, see replies below,
> >
> > Al
> >
> > From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 2:16 AM
> > To: draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry.all@tools.ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> > Cc: gen-art@ietf.org
> > Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry-02
> >
> >
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >
> > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
> >
> > Document:  draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry-02
> >
> > Reviewer: Roni Even
> >
> > Review Date:2015–9-9
> >
> > IETF LC End Date: 2015–9-10
> >
> > IESG Telechat date:
> >
> >
> >
> > Summary: This draft is almost for publication as an Standard Track  RFC.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Major issues:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Minor issues:
> >
> >
> >
> > The document registers IKEv2-derived Shared Secret Key in section 3.2.4. Why here and not in draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec-11.  I suggest deleting the registration of IKEv2-derived Shared Secret Key from here. Otherwise draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec-11 should be normative reference since the [RFC TBD] depends on it and it may cause a delay in publication and creation of the registry.
> >
> > [ACM] It’s here because the IESG review of draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec spawned the question,
> >
> > “can we quickly create the needed registry for OWAMP?”  As a result of discussion and agreement,
> >
> > draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec provides all the IANA Considerations for the TWAMP Registries,
> >
> > and this draft (which draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec is waiting for, not the other way around)
> >
> > provides all the IANA considerations to create the new OWAMP registries.
> >
> >
> >
> > Nits/editorial comments:
> >
> > In sections 3.1.2 and 3.2.2 the policy should be “IETF review” and not “IETF consensus”  according to section 4.1 in RFC5226
> >
> > [ACM] I see, the terminology has changed:
> >
> > IETF Review - (Formerly called "IETF Consensus" in
> >
> >             [IANA-CONSIDERATIONS]) New values are assigned only through
> >
> >             RFCs that have been shepherded through the IESG as AD-
> >
> >             Sponsored or IETF WG Documents [RFC3932] [RFC3978].
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email