IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen_ART review of draft-santesson-auth-context-extension-10

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 20 November 2015 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D018D1A037F for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:12:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jVZXVgWemHD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE961A0383 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9535D2CC5C; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 03:12:16 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ft6D0wbH9MJH; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 03:12:16 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58452CC52; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 03:12:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_26ED5292-44CD-4A37-A2CD-DAE60B64968E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8SSWu-p-exvzpEY=5hVQrHiCnKRkbfMHCevbu8Az=mGwFpRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 03:12:16 +0200
Message-Id: <D4D187AF-63A7-45C0-B5DC-F420CC7FB291@piuha.net>
References: <CAC8SSWu-p-exvzpEY=5hVQrHiCnKRkbfMHCevbu8Az=mGwFpRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/zppDPMUwIG_5YUMVav2JnVh5cCQ>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-santesson-auth-context-extension.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen_ART review of draft-santesson-auth-context-extension-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 01:12:21 -0000

Thanks for your review, Jouni!

(Authors, did you see this review - wanted to make sure no information is lost.)

Jari

On 16 Oct 2015, at 01:56, jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document:draft-santesson-auth-context-extension-10
> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
> Review Date: Oct-15-2015
> IETF LC End Date: Oct-27-2015
> IESG Telechat date: not yet
> 
> 
> Summary:
> --------
> 
> Ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
> 
> Comments:
> ---------
> 
> I do not have deep expertise on the area this I-D covers. Having read it through and knowing the solution is already deployed for few years I have no technical comments.
> 
> Minor issues/nits:
> ------------------
> 1) IDNits result that need to be addressed:
>    ** The abstract seems to contain references ([RFC5280], [SAML]), which it
>       shouldn't.  Please replace those with straight textual mentions of the
>       documents in question.
> 
> 2) == Unused Reference: 'RFC5322' is defined on line 416, but no explicit
>       reference was found in the text
> 
> 
> 3) Since this targets Informational RFC I wouldn't mind seeing all references
>    except RFC2119 as informational references and not normative. We could argue
>    whether RFC2119 language is needed at all (but no strong opinion here).
> 4) Introduction third paragraph:
>    * expand SAML on the first occurrence
>    * I would welcome a reference for "SAML federation"
> 
> 5) Introduction eight paragraph:
>    * expand CA on the first occurrence
> 6) Section 3.1.2:
>    * expand OID on the first occurrence (now it comes after the paragraph
>      explaining "Ref")
>    * three times  s/REF/Ref
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email