IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [tcpm] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-09

Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> Thu, 18 March 2021 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@tenghardt.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E573A32C4; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tenghardt.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6eUJ3aJNBR7x; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hemio.de (mail.hemio.de [136.243.12.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D36F3A32C6; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from user.client.invalid (localhost [136.243.12.180]) by mail.hemio.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06A9CAE; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:51:32 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tenghardt.net; s=20170414; t=1616097094; bh=YdfnHWkKUgJOcTjr/wSumEWMM6/K04qhGhOB0ZhVDx4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=XeCRaabRhQUSVfQCx1ohBjCovX9Wdgu+A6Fl1A8eSpyFVFdl2LUI0dKrY48WOF2Sd ZBECEnggBBnNXyB43a40MUbPxANAgWyyhUWWd05nuk7Occy50H5TvcdGLXdScFKRe1 hPfrhhu5RCzc6e9lhnDKSPtG46llzXERp1aR7Qt9B5geKy53Dq0p3QZ1RZBGSan1m+ MAJKR5ShgvIoni7DdU2BUNJx+XxlXHhwFEr+tvCpINpCd2vE5eOJ3R9/XKp316/F8p 4NnBMgAEjXKeFckKq0dpjOydLGcup8H2m8u5knuUGyMgBM3kkwoah27ALX3Q5DdCU3 71WkxqMcdlcvA==
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, gen-art@ietf.org, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis.all@ietf.org
References: <161376065979.10659.16021515616726523967@ietfa.amsl.com> <C049B972-6362-486B-B3A9-363D3EDC1438@strayalpha.com> <fdea7974-9029-47f7-871e-f507943ab808@tenghardt.net> <42A7F71C-48C6-4DDB-94B8-0AF2CD3A5830@strayalpha.com> <4CEF2136-2C17-4C43-B7BE-E8A95DBDBA3E@strayalpha.com>
From: Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
Message-ID: <1d17d2c0-206a-e099-3282-3eeda8d69303@tenghardt.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:51:30 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4CEF2136-2C17-4C43-B7BE-E8A95DBDBA3E@strayalpha.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ztkEwfF7UlYdSU08MuSDA_MMR64>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [tcpm] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:51:39 -0000

Hi Joe,

Thanks for these changes, they look good to me.

Best,
Theresa


On 3/16/21 2:50 PM, Joseph Touch wrote:
> Hi, Theresa,
>
> FYI - v10 just posted.
>
> Please let me know if this update needs further adjusting.
>
> Joe
>
>> On Mar 15, 2021, at 11:25 PM, Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com 
>> <mailto:touch@strayalpha.com>> wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, an update is coming soon. Regarding one point below:
>>
>>> On Mar 3, 2021, at 6:28 PM, Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net 
>>> <mailto:ietf@tenghardt.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> For a better overview, maybe it would help if these discussion
>>>>> points/considerations were grouped by the TCB value being 
>>>>> discussed, and
>>>>> possibly provided as a list?
>>>> This is a useful idea; we’ll see what we can do in the next update.
>>
>> Upon examination, this doesn’t appear easily possible, as there are 
>> different sets of options discussed in each paragraph and the sets 
>> overlap.
>>
>> Joe
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email