[Gendispatch] Re: Requesting time for draft-rsalz-2418bis in Dublin
"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 16 September 2024 16:26 UTC
Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD51C14F6E4; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 09:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.148, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ft0hc3iqr0Mc; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 09:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97957C14F60D; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 09:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 48G5DETM011698; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:26:33 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to; s= jan2016.eng; bh=/Nsi9X/bycL27s13So7COK0lcjJv92GWshKvhyGGcSY=; b= AYJkobDAZUpy7S97nnRC3qclh4LDNQZ3AgFZ2OpdSWGelh8NFjrckXOSp3Hz9WwG /uJHUhVV7uqKmzdTU8iafGYo+ybrohYfBPq4LPuc8DpqzAEO+M+WXbG3crrzQcAk uHjjO/SsZGC8Nk4COfevp+7fct4dOadBVhXyBCpBFDnnOkwdTgk9j3h6A1QLvjrN KKeRDQ3EcsH69ctkNCTne+RLiCjxR480HnlsZorgiO0WorKZ2lbdZnF0WEXHvW9q sVLivP3MVTrw3WRrCew/cKNRpyQOaDFCf3VAoxajVHo7m333vF2HZES8BG4XyEqf Aoxn27pbNVcm6Tm+7tTZYA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 41n4m25eh5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:26:33 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 48GG4uq0007073; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:26:32 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.21]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 41n5tyyv6k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:26:32 -0400
Received: from usma1ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.23) by usma1ex-dag4mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:26:32 -0400
Received: from usma1ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.23]) by usma1ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.23]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:26:32 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Gendispatch] Requesting time for draft-rsalz-2418bis in Dublin
Thread-Index: AQHbCFUwT3VujOvKLkOIuNrs7uqGKg==
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:26:32 +0000
Message-ID: <60128173-E26D-4919-A8EC-B756F43917F0@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.88.24082514
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_60128173E26D4919A8ECB756F43917F0akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29 definitions=2024-09-16_12,2024-09-13_02,2024-09-02_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=546 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2408220000 definitions=main-2409160107
X-Proofpoint-GUID: LAyc9UJy9rmX8XT9fDCHghVx4jMSPXkN
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: LAyc9UJy9rmX8XT9fDCHghVx4jMSPXkN
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29 definitions=2024-09-06_09,2024-09-06_01,2024-09-02_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=377 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2408220000 definitions=main-2409160108
Message-ID-Hash: K7QLV4KVMM6GIGRX4R47CAELHGKDMCFL
X-Message-ID-Hash: K7QLV4KVMM6GIGRX4R47CAELHGKDMCFL
X-MailFrom: rsalz@akamai.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Gendispatch] Re: Requesting time for draft-rsalz-2418bis in Dublin
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/-aH4zxIcx_WYiVnQTwhf2yyhZ28>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gendispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-leave@ietf.org>
jQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd * We (Scott Bradner and I) have published a draft, draft-rsalz-2418bis, that incorporates RFC 2418 and all the RFCs that subsequently updated it For the most part, each submitted draft incorporates just one “updated-by” RFC. Anyone interested in verifying our work and run a diff between versions and compare it to the RFC(s) that were incorporated.