Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts are IETF stakeholders

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Thu, 13 July 2023 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36B4C14F6EC; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 20:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lUNQNPmlvDON; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 20:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [IPv6:2a00:bd80:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E7BAC151AE8; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 20:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1689220122; bh=CgwlFZ9GZGLTw5eEB90mXqkXVzQaY/HJ07jALrxTivU=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=czHqVIOwyPcteUZlV1sHTYq/eUMtkH7fjShWyFwLCuHAQBMmP7EsVldeRmj9p7+bU LmoWvhTiVNm5LsJrNDTi2kvwnvpzSeVU+4FIBRRTIbj1/TukCqyfiFg+wlp+1kH5A/ jl0RHb0eBAsp8qkF/1LFYG+mhbPlBomj6sH09deA=
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([41.86.46.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-22ubuntu3) with ESMTPA id 36D3mffE283117; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 05:48:42 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-1681F4D1-3981-4C77-B5A0-586C6D10C729"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CAFWDOZAtWL2q9Ev8=iwuzeZici9ujGiheW2tdYg_OMoC2Pk57w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 07:48:31 +0400
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org, Marek Blachut <marek.blachut@dcms.gov.uk>
Message-Id: <C59F42C8-2172-4A61-945A-E664BF172C74@lear.ch>
References: <CAFWDOZAtWL2q9Ev8=iwuzeZici9ujGiheW2tdYg_OMoC2Pk57w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stacie Hoffmann <stacie.hoffmann=40dcms.gov.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (20F75)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/195MAFacmY5tDONderMAUBwSzjk>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts are IETF stakeholders
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 03:49:01 -0000

Taking a step back from this lengthy thread, I wonder if people have taken more meaning than was intended. I am reminded of the RIPE Roundtable discussions and how they help in level setting both policy makers and others in terms of the latest developments both within RIPE and in the broader ecosystem.  

I read the draft as expressing some amount of confusion, and perhaps just a bit of frustration, on the part of policy experts as to how to engage our organization.  There may be, perhaps, too many starting points from their point of view.  I’m not sure simply adding another venue would be helpful, but if my perception is correct (and I could be 180° off) perhaps a bit more thought could be given to the engagement model. 

I would suggest that this work be dispatched to the IAB and also to ISOC’s policy team for further consideration and consultations. 

Eliot

On 13 Jun 2023, at 19:32, Stacie Hoffmann <stacie.hoffmann=40dcms.gov.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:



Hello everyone, 


Many thanks to those of you who provided feedback to us on the Policy Experts are IETF Stakeholders draft at the 116 Gen Dispatch meeting. 


We have uploaded a new version (see below), which we are preparing for the 117 meeting and welcome further input or ideas on how to refine our problem statement or scope potential solutions. In particular, we would welcome specific examples of how and where policy input is working well, and thoughts on a ‘landing space’ or next steps for this work. 


Please reach out to the authors directly with comments or suggestions. 


Also, if anyone is interested in reviewing or contributing to this document please let us know. It would be great to work with others on this. 


Best,

Stacie





---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 10:42
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.txt
To: Marek Blachut <marek.blachut@dcms.gov.uk>, Stacie Hoffmann <stacie.hoffmann@dcms.gov.uk>



A new version of I-D, draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Marek Blachut and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders
Revision:       01
Title:          Policy experts are IETF stakeholders
Document date:  2023-06-13
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          11
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.txt" rel="noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders/" rel="noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders/
Html:           https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.html" rel="noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.html
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders" rel="noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders
Diff:           https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01" rel="noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01

Abstract:
   The IETF’s work has significance for wider societal, economic, and
   political communities, though gaps and barriers to engagement with
   the IETF exist for policy experts.  This informational draft
   introduces a problem statement and gap analysis of existing
   initiatives related to policy expert engagement in the IETF.  It also
   poses questions we hope to work through with others in the IETF
   community regarding how to better enable policy expert engagement in
   IETF standardisation, and on how we can build a culture which better
   supports technical and policy experts working together to develop
   more robust standards.




The IETF Secretariat




--


Text

Description automatically generatedhttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/APouFz9tXhNT856w9DT44amzfHVdI-BgekAl_HjvXVcGnN2-sLy8xfZhsl2UN0Q8rVgkecBSlQ7XnSAs9O-Gf9fXzWYutK6VEm0pKT0UhbRb2rEUMzOvQ5hl5JVB29OUyrTrqiLhZzXdTqz_UxZSKQ" width="169" height="104">


Stacie Hoffmann
Digital Standards Strategy Lead

Department for Science, Innovation & Technology

Tel: 07766598283
stacie.hoffmann@dcms.gov.uk
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-science-innovation-and-technology" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">www.gov.uk/dsit | https://twitter.com/SciTechgovuk" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/SciTechgovuk 







--
Gendispatch mailing list
Gendispatch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch