Re: [Gendispatch] coders in IETF (was: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF)

Eliot Lear <> Wed, 24 February 2021 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361653A16DF for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:43:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pLABrRKNEMT6 for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A29783A166E for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:43:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=1888; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1614181388; x=1615390988; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=qJQwB1mWsQvV6MtHLgh2WDsk8y6B+1dvkMD85s14yfU=; b=KVWe9CXlRgDe7f2Q4D5uicYwmWd6llYD0kO/8a9n3Y3YsSbgFbpa0d7n 387AMVJ+HuscQKJEN2cON8Y/c0kTHbXtvX/fBZ86QL/Ws2Fq0V+YlS9H5 /wk1yA9otDqy8hvMLltQ8rnDp6YFwLDPvnV+/TZx4dbEgX+FuxKcbhYQt U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C7AQBdczZglxbLJq1iHQICCRQFBYIQg3cBJxKEcokEp?= =?us-ascii?q?SYEBwEBAQoDAQE0BAEBhE0CgXgmOBMCAwEBAQMCAwEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBBQBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAYZDhkUGI1YQC0ICAlcGgn4BgwaubHaBMoVYhG0QgTiBU4tvQoIDg?= =?us-ascii?q?TgcgiI1PoQIg0w0gisEgVWBWUMygTyBFpxhnE+DBoMvgTyLWItXAx+jSrJsg?= =?us-ascii?q?3MCBAYFAhaBayGBWTMaCBsVZQGCPz0SGQ2OOI4wQANnAgYBCQEBAwmJUS2CF?= =?us-ascii?q?QEB?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,203,1610409600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="33701562"
Received: from (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 24 Feb 2021 15:43:04 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 11OFh39l025795 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:43:04 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5CE5C1BD-50E0-4DB4-83DA-0A9255153231"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.\))
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:43:03 +0100
In-Reply-To: <>
To: Bron Gondwana <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] coders in IETF (was: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:43:10 -0000


… I think the draft that Keith and Fernando wrote is a good start.

The organization might need a bit of work, but I like the idea of having a menu from which we can pick in order to address some, but perhaps not all, of the issues.

Also, first, it would be good to quantify the situation.  In what dimensions are we diverse and in what dimensions are we not?  Second, for each dimension in which we are not, some discussion as to which of the issues raised hits which dimension.  That is, draw out the possible causalities.

It could be that some logic is wrong.  What are the questions that need to be asked and answered to validate the assertions being made, and which parties are in a good position to ask, and which are in a good position to answer?

This sets up an opportunity to see that any changes we make will likely have some effect.