IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?

"Pete Resnick" <resnick@episteme.net> Thu, 27 February 2020 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE6E3A0D94; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:04:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FXfh8etHYovp; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437CE3A0E6E; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8EDA17A6CA; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:04:33 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G2yXgd3j3dIz; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:04:33 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B12EA17A6C0; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:04:33 -0600 (CST)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:04:33 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <F2D8D859-724B-4313-88CB-921909FF33A9@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <97866639-e9b5-89b8-ede2-b1abdc79fe5b@nostrum.com>
References: <ED3EB3D9-480E-4D58-8767-0B1B4202F6C0@episteme.net> <97866639-e9b5-89b8-ede2-b1abdc79fe5b@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/1c-sCeT7k-tAeiBOm2qZfhgwuk8>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:04:37 -0000

I forgot to ask you Adam: How much time did you want on the agenda?

pr

On 18 Jan 2020, at 16:18, Adam Roach wrote:

> On 1/15/20 22:34, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> As the time quickly approaches for requesting a meeting for the March 
>> IETF, your gendispatch chairs wonder if there are agenda items for 
>> which we should schedule a meeting. Please let us know on the 
>> gendispatch list (the Reply-To on this message is set there) within 
>> the next two weeks if you have any potential agenda items so we can 
>> decide if a meeting is necessary.
>
>
> GENDISPATCH chairs --
>
> I'm planning to spin a new version of draft-roach-bis-documents in the 
> next few weeks, based on the feedback that has been provided so far. I 
> think this would be a candidate for discussion in GENDISPATCH.
>
> /a


-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email