[Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF)

Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> Thu, 25 February 2021 04:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@tenghardt.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D6F3A0F00; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:00:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tenghardt.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KS2c30dXgZ6S; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:00:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hemio.de (mail.hemio.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 713DC3A0F35; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from user.client.invalid (localhost []) by mail.hemio.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0120AA; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 05:00:02 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tenghardt.net; s=20170414; t=1614225605; bh=CC40o7Pyllzxm1fcVQ2TO1Qm5aS/pNR43L2Zymzpsg8=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DVca39dNe8HjDZ57oGz+yP1Y0A3E3DgEGqFFxKOrKWpEzfn83nwA+kY+Hsu9bGf6Y uJ5ApmB2KiGogMZNw4n5z/n/lde3tRtXD2Qld+UoX3u0qZRL75Jni4qG28uH6S8MnV 7zNBin8Mvj6zKaQISEx/UD5qu9kBN96MmeDg0k4/WZC1N9AIt2IP42QfgJvM/LgJaB LvWXx4095S4JytXrkmIbmIJhFvhNRrsTOrCwYDUekI4tT4RI5egqp80Pio/m5PkUlq gA2cKbG/I2iyioTbLwCD+CnVL4EqnU86WbUmKwh47LTdFGc2wVtJqJVbTEkVDCMDzq 7OryEM69kp0fw==
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com>
Cc: "'ietf@ietf.org'" <ietf@ietf.org>, GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
From: Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
Message-ID: <41698b83-25ff-574e-390a-65a8c3dc591a@tenghardt.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:59:59 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/2r8cuTr-WQ6A95PHBNlF6PeX2ok>
Subject: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF)
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 04:00:10 -0000

Hi Fernando, Keith,

On 2/22/21 4:07 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> We have submitted a new I-D, entitled "Diversity and Inclusiveness in 
> the IETF".
> The I-D is available at: 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gont-diversity-analysis-00.txt

Thank you for this document.

One perspective that I missed in this document is academia, as I have 
participated in the IETF as an academic for a few years.

The document mentions "Universities" as an example of organizations for 
which IETF participation might not [be] attractive or feasible. I'm not 
sure I agree.

Some benefits of participating in the IETF for researchers, PhD 
students, etc, potentially to be added to Section 4 as a separate group, 

- Getting feedback on your work, e.g., assumptions you may be making, 
things you may have overlooked, direction for future work
- Input for your own teaching (learning about the IETF and its processes 
has very much enhanced discussions with my students)
- Making industry connections, e.g., for joint projects
- Professional networking, career advancement

When it comes to attending IETF meetings, I think it's worth mentioning 
that they are sometimes co-located with ANRW, an academic workshop, and 
that a lot of IRTF meetings are taking place during the same week. Also, 
there are efforts in the IRTF, such as the IRTF research prize, which 
may help PhD students get an ROI for their IETF-related work, feedback, 
and the opportunity to attend an IETF meeting.

Of course, a lot of the same structural problems that the draft mentions 
still apply to academics, and not all universities are "equal" (e.g., 
big/famous ones probably often have an easier time sending people than 
smaller ones).

One specific example would be Economic Constraints, Section 9: 
Universities usually have a travel budget and they may also have rules 
on how much a hotel is allowed to cost per night. IETF hotels are 
usually, if not always, outside of that budget, and overflow hotels are, 
too. I've usually managed to find something in adequate distance, but it 
did feel a bit strange to be basically excluded from the "official" hotels.

That's just my initial thoughts, and feel free to include them in the draft.