Re: [Gendispatch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-01.txt

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 18 November 2021 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE603A0528 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:46:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JD_GCa0coaQb for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC5E3A040B for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.46.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 1AIKjjlR027140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:46:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1637268373; x=1637354773; i=@elandsys.com; bh=e64PuzzscSvl9K580bNeW60ngGS8avf/r4Sb7CTmq00=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=prVxIgRo1aJ6PIjE8PPDF+0DvuhqoYf+bugAAtYTWu3mguqmVmKCfu9TgBEKS+4B+ zJD8igflWjDW+0xFoGF9eC2OEVySEoGbVpcHBKhRLm9kAORVAdyeIrJEZ7ShqP16U2 xybR1W8PWQxhecwJW0o1lO5o8N92hmILUl+4MeDk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20211118121634.07f1c400@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:45:12 -0800
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, gendispatch@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211116174121.C835C3003718@ary.qy>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20211115202247.0ad123a8@elandnews.com> <20211116174121.C835C3003718@ary.qy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/3DuACU1OdxhUe7mE9hMsp5xSEx0>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 20:46:21 -0000

Hi John,
At 09:41 AM 16-11-2021, John Levine wrote:
>It's not just the LLC.  If we got into antitrust legal trouble the results
>might include fines, which would be the LLC's problem, but also
>restrictions on the way we operate which would be the entire IETF's problem.

The decision in 2018 was set the scope the of the LLC effort to 
matters related to the 4071 IASA only.  It does not make sense to 
come and change that a few years later unless there is, for example, 
some potential legal trouble which was not foreseen at that time.

I agree with the point you made about a LLC's problem becoming an 
IETF's problem.  The "dispatch" approach is not well-suited for this 
type of problem.  Furthermore, there was a concern about EAR.  The 
topic keeps coming back.  It is not a good idea to push the topic 
aside without giving any thought to it.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy