IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on charter-ietf-gendispatch-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 15 December 2021 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086743A00F7; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:06:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05Ug5ZR_H5S1; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBBB53A0105; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:d882:dbf6:7ad7:3ad7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26D2A606EDC; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:06:43 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1639588003; bh=z8uknvwNssEE242mdj1thxbjeL5BBLBumRbweV8GVfE=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=DtP2xUecTihsA5OmELwd6Lvld8s8MV6c88+qH7wH8BGGZbim5ALCQ1p74j45p46I4 IhSDcuXwEWvAeCavAEclUrB2lYWC9oRDT8C8zZ8d6Gg7OmLU/QC0eTMsIN+NJD7lDP yF6sRIBTZ6y7+Q4ox4YMP6IrN48v+CoYPIUhfoZ0=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5D8F580A-D5D0-4AF2-B8C1-9586B00F8AD3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <c187fc4a-22f7-b92a-6a4a-eb9b94eb53d7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:06:42 +0200
Cc: Pete Resnick <resnick=40episteme.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, gendispatch-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <51F0B6D0-E351-4668-A13C-5502D79DB5DE@eggert.org>
References: <163842543502.20877.4835523817199553759@ietfa.amsl.com> <01D32738-3C5B-4EB7-B0CF-33343C187969@episteme.net> <21FE53D5-D4E8-4978-BBCC-92719589EED7@eggert.org> <c187fc4a-22f7-b92a-6a4a-eb9b94eb53d7@gmail.com>
To: Tony Rutkowski <rutkowski.tony@gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 26D2A606EDC.A84DE
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/3TCLmb70Qx-lfQ4PomIlEg3pv5Y>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on charter-ietf-gendispatch-01-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 17:07:00 -0000

Hi Tony,

On 2021-12-15, at 18:43, Tony Rutkowski <rutkowski.tony@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Antitrust law applies to all anticompetitive behavior irrespective of the body.  It is unclear why the guidelines would not be equally applicable to all these bodies.

this thread is about the gendispatch rechartering, not draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust.

Thanks,
Lars


> 
> --amr
> 
> On 13-Dec-21 10:26 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> based on what Pete wrote, my suggestion is to replace:
>> 
>>> Work related to the IAB, IRTF, and RFC Editor processes is out of scope.
>> with
>> 
>>   Work related to the IAB, IRTF, and RFC  Editor processes are out of scope,
>>   but when discussions in GENDISPATCH identify such work items, they can
>>   be suggested to those bodies for action.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Lars
>> 
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email