IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 24 February 2021 04:21 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46CB3A0C3D for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:21:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e_WOZmKCpyl1 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:21:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A07D3A0C38 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:21:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id c19so465484pjq.3 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:21:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mGEMv5XFKEwVpQKFTPwjd63UfeUou4XBWeftG7xF6ws=; b=d4MyYj0+CKD+dZl3tXFBrC3Ym5jHoj2vavU+9OoFcxVh0kTpWVQ5SWwP82ntpNe0mc N9OXF24oubTgeSfkBZiPAVYRlMuB8WMNN5cm8hs5O2DjRL/OFopkBWw5jSVEa0GWt82l HnLkeFuAXY+c9gxoXmLE3nLpMY77Bae/Qd5i4CTsZQAwBvCQvQvLILJLyZO1Mjh5x4DS m7YVojw9DWDXS3rmFp8koZEk4Cv1PeIyPM9p8g3OgaRLI+rt0BJipeb889DXyl21acbE FOlhqnx8oYM4wqxDLXSPRILchH1em70Yeb23NUP4hPGCVDRowK4UN5d4/u/LfiqoECNN SgLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mGEMv5XFKEwVpQKFTPwjd63UfeUou4XBWeftG7xF6ws=; b=lyZkRRPsqao8RJCFrwxof2zOyyniBpMriroq6aHLbDJVbRZAyCXgKo4PbDhIkTHg0u 8BOt7KQh68L/48pGwfFuI49MF8yebajLYVXpdx1nxOwDmVDcr1smmpVYfri9hJp/tC2V mvAVbPG/m9+7WNiJyZFCxDyknMdlhLAHqzy0a2HMrth1LD7Vn4dnN5pZzLIsa9SSuCeM IIXOXhNdfvySk/nSMqi4YnUmAnMocL6PK+3FLeyoxnT7mOmfD7YG8sdzBpQ3gOZGSJql MSMlstzMPMGKUa5fix+aAPzeS6nHt1q4bZ01BIbE238iFcJmE8dUCSWCQN/holYrFnFl 22Zw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530170YLsmZA5ovViRxWJioG5Tl4tjOnHin65j0XGqxz9LiZdhws tjL2VAA+mYTKbxwtSNVqvoI/4X+splvUxA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMl+lwDCsMALt/ig3PV62E+wcn9XgQ9WvUXsMr45aJXzzVWwsFOLa/JxyCTTYUJ5KSuunIDQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3783:: with SMTP id mz3mr954135pjb.88.1614140501471; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:21:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.131.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 72sm764693pfv.5.2021.02.23.20.21.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:21:40 -0800 (PST)
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Juliana Guerra <juliana@derechosdigitales.org>, gendispatch@ietf.org
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com> <2b9ed952-a255-72a2-6a83-46a8eed46f96@derechosdigitales.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20210223201214.15b20660@elandnews.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <578155df-2940-381a-dfed-ec07251e0106@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:21:36 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20210223201214.15b20660@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/3fQW60jtwaocCp-ErBqkRJgUl-4>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:21:44 -0000

On 24-Feb-21 17:15, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Juliana,
> At 09:00 AM 23-02-2021, Juliana Guerra wrote:
>> - In section 11.3 Comfort Zone, I missed at least a comment about the
>> difficulties and necessary compromises to deal with disagreement and
>> difference. I think it would be useful to mention RFC 7154 and RFC 7776,
>> and consider the list Vittorio B shared before.
> 
> My experience of RFC 7776 is that it does not work.

Can you please provide some more details of that assertion, suitably anonymized?

Regards
    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email