IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-eggert-bcp45bis-01.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 30 March 2021 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFB13A11F7 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLpoTGK-4x2I for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1ECC3A11F5 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1965; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1617110413; x=1618320013; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=WKJd91ztCeksfmBamTPTDhJvtC0lOU6G9k7nrYxaOtI=; b=J0DdTPTSpO8X9Cy8FjOpLsYiFLIGr/U+aLUTM85Sb94pZFrJU1ub/9N4 u4GSM5w9P6yL/Cf8dhmnZ2hGWWgiBepQWIgUUYRixHvOkHa2tgffqHuN/ kwbwoEevapJ8V/CwivmB08Tn5MRWPK/FJ71WPgPhHNdceGyTP1v8uoBYX w=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: A0AHAACIJGNglxbLJq1aGgEBAQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBARIBAQEBAgIBAQEBgX8CAQEBAQsBg3YBJxIxhEGJBIhMnF8EBwEBAQoDAQE0BAEBhFACgXsmNwYOAgMBAQEDAgMBAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEFAEBAQEBAQEBhkOGRAEBAQECASNWBQsLGCoCAlcGE4JwAYJmIao6d4EyhViEXhCBOQGBUot3QoILgTkMEIJZPodWNYIrBIFLgTkqoHaceoMRgzqBRJdoAx+DSJBRkDiXFZx/g34CBAYFAhaBaiKBWzMaCBsVOyoBgj4+EhkNjjiOMT8DLzgCBgEJAQEDCYkfAQE
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:+Gk8QKPUkhzY+8BcTkOjsMiAIKoaSvp033AA3SlKOH9oW+afkN 2jm+le6A/shF8qNE0ItNicNMC7IE/02oVy5eAqV4uKfA6jg2ewKZEn0I2K+V3dMgnz7PRU26 slU6UWMrDNJHx7icq/3wWiCdYnx7C8n5yAvuvVw3dzQQwCUcgJhDtRMQqVHlZ7QwNLH/MCZf +hz/BarDmtc2l/VKqGL0QCNtKzxeHjpdbDaR4CCwVP0njrsRqYrJjnDhOfwhASFxRIzLtKyx miryXJooO+rvq81hjQk1X20q0Tst7gxtxfbfb87fQoFg==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,290,1610409600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="34555786"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 30 Mar 2021 13:20:11 +0000
Received: from [10.61.144.91] ([10.61.144.91]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 12UDKARJ027847 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:20:11 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <F701BE88-6325-45D0-877C-0CBCFFE71468@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_43E231DE-8E3E-4563-9433-14B61ADC3F2F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:20:10 +0200
In-Reply-To: <10400F6C-C9E3-4136-A4FE-D97B83E6F67C@eggert.org>
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
References: <161701910454.13044.908232164554537032@ietfa.amsl.com> <55b4e061-f25d-8958-1e75-868bec0c735e@gmail.com> <D277EB6F-FDB1-4588-A77B-FC29B0FB782F@eggert.org> <963ED8F3-712F-4E8D-BF29-A3E7735E4641@mnot.net> <53AB2142-8BC2-43AC-86E7-EC9F1E72D9D3@cisco.com> <71B14C3D-AF8C-4C7F-9C14-03686F499E4D@eggert.org> <0B3C59C9-5057-4DC2-AF1E-CA3216436996@cisco.com> <10400F6C-C9E3-4136-A4FE-D97B83E6F67C@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.144.91, [10.61.144.91]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/3udEiBucMigf3ItZ42gRxuGfCb8>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-eggert-bcp45bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:20:19 -0000

Lars,

> On 30 Mar 2021, at 14:58, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 2021-3-30, at 15:07, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>> That’s my point.  Before we do a BCP45 update, perhaps we should ask if we should go farther, and take on Mark’s draft as well in this context, and then consider what should be done.  I like the idea of facilitated conversation.  I think it could be fun (a term not usually associated with the IETF list) but that’s me.  I’m sure others have their own ideas.
> 
> I'd prefer to do a minimal update to BCP45 soon, to bring its charter back in line with its current use.
> 
> We can always revise it again, when there is consensus on more fundamental changes.

If we have to have consensus on changes, what is the point of dispatching at all?  We might as well just go right to RFC from here.  You are setting the bar so high that we cannot even have the discussion.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email