Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification - draft-eggert-bcp45bis-04.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 10 September 2021 11:01 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49623A114D; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 04:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SE22b2eSC5Gx; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 04:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-f50.google.com (mail-vs1-f50.google.com [209.85.217.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F563A113E; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 04:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-f50.google.com with SMTP id s25so1182635vsa.9; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 04:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4bvHQdJCYHVXVkI0JSv1+AL5HuAa8JBubOpMJsfnA5Q=; b=WO7HaVfv1WnD5i60iMrzFzOUh25FQ5B/lXC8lKtXoWUsA0U/ZpbiOKHDRQVOvQDVEJ wMesHwlZWJojEqL8nlSyhV09d5uSpiMC93UII2eyNAvJWAhfete8FhpvFDbfQ08/G3WF zLgFzBbBge4UtgXoxU43/eKg9RT8R/l5acHuOwLPayCOXjkIHYMT2ku5ej+6Di2xZMl1 nu1DFWULVLgaMv4wmG4hDlTbZQj5+VIIaziOL9giDwqXFF9ePln+UJRaQ7S/S+hOs+ex 4pATgeFrufz6mjIwIrjslqKS8w9kuMJ/6SHyoX1Ruzla9LhJMiBItROyHp4U6TjOGifH nvfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oi6Yc1tIcCznC/yFWGx7Nh3VKiQvpWx7+3RzeusujauwYs/Iz P2ygHCAa3k4Hsj3uNV3ZigmXHAVV79FMm6raX+k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDe2rB7/AlElOIHa6pHkA1Fr7qAP23WLJfPY9edbaMt6++5Kw9uthWAiP2o2fLicjPj2aD7cwd2nfsMbySjFk=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:dc8b:: with SMTP id g11mr5081500vsk.26.1631271710274; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 04:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163101639697.11702.11425677914483803771@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJK7gF_FZRoYc_mhk62jGEvsO8oD-_rSpBErwNRvjHmpEg@mail.gmail.com> <40144D1F-3D7F-4C43-9C4E-2F914B5458D1@eggert.org> <CALaySJJ7=7W2BRHW9q=2EP15-W_sdypu6Z6K_=UeqAOMVK+hNQ@mail.gmail.com> <0415be9c-4b25-0e08-fe9f-7c927c0765d3@gmail.com> <1130F786-31F0-4421-A062-DE3F80F4B368@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <1130F786-31F0-4421-A062-DE3F80F4B368@eggert.org>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:01:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJh=TMfKnQ+K9XcaUU8o=zBzEsPM59M2HLxspMb4by=_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, draft-eggert-bcp45bis.all@ietf.org, GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/4P4ozzXGX6APbsz7z2uOZJFz52s>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification - draft-eggert-bcp45bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:01:57 -0000

That works for me, Lars, and thanks.

I see Brian's point about Gen AD instead of IETF Chair, but I don't
agree with it here, because the SAAs are explicitly appointed by the
IETF Chair, not related to the Gen Area.

Barry

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 3:11 AM Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a proposed change to use the normal RFC2026 appeals process in https://github.com/larseggert/bcp45bis/pull/7/files. This is the current change:
>
> --- a/draft-eggert-bcp45bis.md
> +++ b/draft-eggert-bcp45bis.md
> @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ manner.
>
>  Because an SAA serves at the discretion of the IETF Chair - even if the IETF
>  Chair is not otherwise involved in the operation of the SAA team - any SAA
> -decision could be appealed to the IAB. The IAB shall then review the situation
> -and attempt to resolve it in a manner of its own choosing.
> +decision can be appealed to the IETF Chair, per {{!RFC2026}}. Decisions by the
> +IETF Chair can be appealed to the IESG as whole, again per {{!RFC2026}}.
>
>  # Security Considerations
>
> Please let me know if this expresses what is desired?
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>