Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-gendispatch-discuss-criteria-01.txt

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 24 July 2023 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8F8C14F747 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cCVNy4Q9wdus for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EF45C151070 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4R8x5W3vqjz6GyJN; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1690240943; bh=aj+2u/Nbo8EbfuxTxsmX9hZ0ZEuV3U/NC0i9hI4jO1s=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Uqt+X56ZuUn2/T93Yjf7MwG0mYidMtvy3Zytwc6c45DT3436vlU633XT17ZA1JVK/ XYw9vIM9ALHMbp9/VWWCVtMbCLVwleHfzXxJTTkdZLs2heS/qtfxkF4QNZHKrBLHbb rOTbRE786g9SxjFnExQW/kFIJgHATtktF3TEdACM=
X-Quarantine-ID: <s0bVG3Tpf1HH>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [IPV6:2001:67c:1232:144:39cf:45cb:650b:3c3d] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:39cf:45cb:650b:3c3d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4R8x5W1Vsjz6GyF1; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <57e2fce3-a5ed-da4e-8d03-5aaa8a78d33b@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 19:22:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
References: <169023252206.3556.2411879594436244120@ietfa.amsl.com> <260FFE3E-99ED-4295-8739-64D71D5F658D@mnot.net> <6ead24f4-1180-758e-0611-bbccf77fe43b@joelhalpern.com> <818F9D46-A782-42D4-8D6F-4E199571F67E@mnot.net>
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <818F9D46-A782-42D4-8D6F-4E199571F67E@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/5BCK3JBUTjISlyVqGmSXQz3ThxA>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-gendispatch-discuss-criteria-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 23:22:28 -0000

Sorry, I managed to miss that completely.  An understandable goal.  And 
the note completely answers the question I asked and should have 
prevented it.

Yours,

Joel

On 7/24/2023 7:20 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> As the note says, this is an exact copy of the current DISCUSS criteria, except where the Introduction talks about the document's status.
>
>
>> On 24 Jul 2023, at 4:16 pm, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>>
>> It would be interesting to have an informative section of the draft explaining where this matches and / or differs from the existing IESG discuss policy.  (One obvious place is the addition of using DISUCSS to say "no", but I presume there are others.)
>> Yours,
>> Joel
>> On 7/24/2023 5:02 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> Hi GENDISPATCH!
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to get some of the unused time in this week's meeting to dispatch this draft?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-gendispatch-discuss-criteria-01.txt
>>>> Date: 24 July 2023 at 2:02:02 pm GMT-7
>>>> To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-gendispatch-discuss-criteria-01.txt
>>>> has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the
>>>> IETF repository.
>>>>
>>>> Name: draft-nottingham-gendispatch-discuss-criteria
>>>> Revision: 01
>>>> Title: DISCUSS Criteria
>>>> Document date: 2023-07-24
>>>> Group: Individual Submission
>>>> Pages: 9
>>>> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-gendispatch-discuss-criteria-01.txt
>>>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-gendispatch-discuss-criteria/
>>>> Html:           https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-gendispatch-discuss-criteria-01.html
>>>> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-gendispatch-discuss-criteria
>>>> Diff:           https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-nottingham-gendispatch-discuss-criteria-01
>>>>
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>    This document describes the role of the 'DISCUSS' position in the
>>>>    IESG review process.  It gives some guidance on when a DISCUSS should
>>>>    and should not be issued.  It also discusses procedures for DISCUSS
>>>>    resolution.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>>
>>>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>