IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] Gendispatch meeting minutes and dispatch outcomes @IETF117

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 16 August 2023 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A90DC14068D for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xzufc_r927JL for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14D84C140675 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 2130B80869 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:05:49 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1692194749; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to: references; bh=DlhP7eIFXn6HH4bt6srYRmD3KfoUtw327j46enXBT10=; b=b8Pzu6e71CCDwAlpOHB4JEE1brmyAw0RsJfFLN6tDjEWILVaE/WCJca0cs066bJBT7ZZ0i +2seyAwEB9uyOgYpEtlGf1P3rbxCVmrNvYbFhgxDbxGs97PtMfJyU4vZdW/N62x0aSBm60 v6+A1kiUkuI2fGcQIwfE057kRETPBhQ+Lb8sqLTLBDEHtadGXqi7ETUVCKRTzkJOFqtKWs 9eaqNsPaVIOL7lgScUnGXCWym9mRMM9xd2Wb3G6cC+hONnFiir3QCW1sWqB/gixmBhVuNr finsO8PlB/q2SdUVsIdReWB+hgfBqrZ3tPjezHzNpd56OfhDcGkqiLZ5eXeaUA==
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8E548F8B-45BC-45A5-BACC-4BC8515DFF59"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:05:48 +0300
References: <aafe73b60edd4b3ba351dfaaf94126ab@huawei.com>
To: "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <aafe73b60edd4b3ba351dfaaf94126ab@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <0311E94C-D5B3-4E39-8A0C-BE64AFE6F724@eggert.org>
X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/5oeHKYPCHATI8Nx8wYFwzk2oqWQ>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Gendispatch meeting minutes and dispatch outcomes @IETF117
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:05:55 -0000

Hi,

On Aug 3, 2023, at 12:26, Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <pengshuping@huawei.com> wrote:
>  1.      Making Less Work for Area Directors:
> Interests expressed in support of this work continuing. Recommendations include to reduce the scope to few actionable items as it is perceived as too broad, to gather data to help with the diagnostic, and to involve a wider community via e.g., a BoF, to get additional inputs and form a better understanding of priorities/expectations.
...
>  4.      DISCUSS Criteria:
> Interest and support for that initiative. More discussions are needed to recommend how to dispatch that work. An open question is whether this should be bundled with the first item.

since these two might involve a BOF proposal, individually or jointly, please note that those are due on September 8. It is extremely helpful if a proposal is received as early as possible, to enable the IESG and IAB to engage with the proponents.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status