Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt

[Rob Sayre <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:46 PM Livingood, Jason <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> > Well, that just says this document is needed due to "growing concern in
> the community". Fine. I don't think it's needed (and I seem to be one of
> the only people that reads any of these documents), but most of what's in
> it is true.
>
> This is IMO one of those issues where IETF community consensus needs to be
> developed and show us a path forward. My understanding of the process as it
> stands now (and Lars can correct me) is GenDispatch will either dispatch it
> to a particular area or WG or to do it in the Gen Area (or take no action I
> suppose).
>

That sounds right to me. I think if people read the relevant documents,
including the existing BCPs linked by the draft, and the IETF LLC statement
I linked, consensus will readily emerge.

My personal opinion is that no change is necessary, and the IETF LLC
statement from last year is excellent and correct, but I don't I also don't
think any really bad outcome is possible if people actually do their
homework. :)

thanks,
Rob