Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Mon, 06 September 2021 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6123A162B for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 17:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KKtTEWZqUqcc for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 17:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 060593A1629 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 17:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id m7-20020a9d4c87000000b0051875f56b95so6743182otf.6 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 17:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=+2bBYspShtuUK5P+VAaEVb80Q6/3SDiDcdHOZ2vzioA=; b=LyxiN/9gEvP82TkCwqkLY7qjFiyQhJVjOx2gIkZ0JJtaQwVW+awpVPQtKEPFGNxyZY BGk9C3nQloQRWt44hRFDfBfJs2eIoR2Qa8fSxy+DdQBX/Jg70uWHnlqWdnDezhoXfwGB rc3UVN6aWABapafg5f380EsPxoNcJXgnai08ZL45VTsKmMdo+2yCTTnPlGrdXrN9KrPB OM3H8REkAecqfqZWQvAL+8DAYX/beDc8Av6XiurGkTUD0LYjxBALmghmw2mN3uzvN8gW w5gTa15wRC2WGgHVbzZwBPvv+6f+CcG622WNZeFqYAlxPW0CaI0Zc4W6CRpdxs4D7KyY cqyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=+2bBYspShtuUK5P+VAaEVb80Q6/3SDiDcdHOZ2vzioA=; b=KsPzLdGVNYixaa/fDeNzf3SsMbye/T/EI1tzyPuUKhm45rgB9Tnw75krhdxy7uoVNx +SKsTyAvTZHcyMZIzjTkXhovABK4aLtPGhtFnrnCxmSe7S/n/7pUlnKYpF8Tzi91Brmv geQThqio6uONjk1pUIgT2+h2hL4gJ/31+iaXqUi58gn6K5XO+NAl0f6gxm5A0W/QN4pc BFhAMHTc+kZXu4yRLIxQA3+Ij2WyrMHKo3aN2Yjt26wdhC2vsekE/JRpdCxPrHwNmqeB 3NsEaWawZ/J1e9qbhuvOMMV//Sjea3xvbSMlfnkU2J+CayCZPay+1yjnaBGWOdTEtYhc 642g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533UqlFYjxqHtpf9QNkHrTtBg0w5kwroXAiJXx00/zvGYi78o66M w5hZVMkNwk0qrqnCcY7VYR2JG7CEhnY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGQVmdjKPwymOWgs7/rrQ3RF4t3iGbfoD3wxB/SWbGVxTVM+ev2teDDdZj0yOTVhciyq44ZA==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:77da:: with SMTP id w26mr8664697otl.293.1630887665224; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 17:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.199] (c-73-223-183-113.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.223.183.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7sm1455184oti.65.2021.09.05.17.21.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Sep 2021 17:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <B5C8B3CE-D849-4E72-B4D1-B69E132D227E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B5838CD1-6586-40EC-A0A9-C38CA0D1D6E4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 17:21:01 -0700
In-Reply-To: <d9a5046e-09fc-5cf5-1354-545e22f356f7@gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, gendispatch@ietf.org
To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <163037412640.15437.266878243771416247@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAChr6Sysc7bnah1t0w2EuMEwvO0Y2V8zVdsupNi9r8v2EQ=csQ@mail.gmail.com> <5da63a02-bbc2-98a9-5a19-745179744192@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SwjazBjSj6XzmCDO0pnsibxohU=40TkJ0GnAJ+_t5zSHw@mail.gmail.com> <05211e39-419d-2455-ffa3-1a55fab22a48@joelhalpern.com> <CANMZLAaiPjeO7wMrfjjd5-XJpzYm3iUTExdUqD+JBm9mCYgvNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SztfuauB1vTLpu6L-AeaShRfZ-Ybs_d+2p8oaMBBvKjyQ@mail.gmail.com> <f706ce7f-2967-50ad-eaf0-e9b168b5a6e8@gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw+KVW_Jq5LZFN_KJ9ygxb9=sFoRNs2yAPeiPLV3A1Y=w@mail.gmail.com> <9b819b2d-4de2-800d-190c-4c7cbfc2465e@gmail.com> <CAChr6Sy_F6yg2UGC_LSBvpMQr25bwH=CUq9jh78_h13iyyh9yg@mail.gmail.com> <7da21d8a-bdc1-6974-c485-9ed1b2e4910a@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SxzYCC=eYySGuAeHY6=pXcAR+sBvAR7iuqTqcDwitb4LA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sy3=xWWejpPrmMRSgE18CNVs29NtxzJfv_nm55oXq215g@mail.gmail.com> <LO3P265MB2092E4BED687A5F3EF7935EEC2D19@LO3P265MB2092.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <d9a5046e-09fc-5cf5-1354-545e22f356f7@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/ACm4gQ5XxL-izUF1AhuDEexIODI>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:21:12 -0000

Hi,

I support going forward with this document.

> On Sep 5, 2021, at 2:11 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 06-Sep-21 06:34, Andrew Campling wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2021 at 05:50 Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com <mailto:sayrer@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>> It's a good point. So, by that rationale, it seems safe to strike "This document does not contain legal advice"
>> 
>> I would suggest retaining the text "This document does not contain legal advice" to avoid any misunderstandings.
> 
> I suggest that "This document does not constitute formal legal advice" would be clearer.

I could go either way (that is, with our without “formal” in the sentence), but I do think there should be a sentence like this in the document.

Bob