Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 24 February 2021 04:16 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD2C3A0C04 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:16:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N6hjCGpoJax5 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327E93A0C03 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:16:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.185.46]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 11O4GHph022607 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:16:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1614140189; x=1614226589; i=@elandsys.com; bh=7vnol+9NP0XPSGcemnkg0E9QWl86HAKtzodCtFiLoW4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=TIJJzdvA6lq2t7YhJ4ys4laJB0WHWIcB2bsC0ic5Tjt6Iq+6KTW9F8tccBAPQ2Tbw WlaeL2MWucPFN9ePd/7KIUWF362XPqJCcuKuqcF8dt5l33GBh8nqIx0rmyziYFO5CU vN+DDXLp5AkFQPEwew2sMDdvYITaxJB2FdyXOyUg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20210223201214.15b20660@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:15:34 -0800
To: Juliana Guerra <juliana@derechosdigitales.org>, gendispatch@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <2b9ed952-a255-72a2-6a83-46a8eed46f96@derechosdigitales.org >
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com> <2b9ed952-a255-72a2-6a83-46a8eed46f96@derechosdigitales.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/Ajao-CmQnS2tW_1SnEX-IXHM-So>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:16:46 -0000

Hi Juliana,
At 09:00 AM 23-02-2021, Juliana Guerra wrote:
>- In section 11.3 Comfort Zone, I missed at least a comment about the
>difficulties and necessary compromises to deal with disagreement and
>difference. I think it would be useful to mention RFC 7154 and RFC 7776,
>and consider the list Vittorio B shared before.

My experience of RFC 7776 is that it does not work.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy