Re: [Gendispatch] Final public warning (Was: Messages from the gendispatch list for the week ending Sun Apr 11 06:00:06 2021)

[Dan Harkins <[e-mail]>]

   You know what's inappropriate? Copyrighting your email with some
vague legalesey footer.

   You chastising my reference to the distinctive features of someone
(what "characterizing" means) is not subject to a FOIA request! Is
that a joke?

   Dan.

On 4/19/21 10:13 AM, Kirsty P wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2021, at 18:27, Dan Harkins wrote:
>
> >On 4/14/21 3:55 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
> >>
> >> To me, it shows that the IETF list should not be given the deference
> >> it is now (as suggested in other drafts).
>
> >  To me it shows that you're probably not the right person to write a
> > draft to cancel the IETF list.
>
>
> Dan,
>
> That comment is inappropriate, characterizing another participant
> on the list. You've been warned about this sort of message repeatedly.
>
> While the chairs are under no obligation to give you a public warning
> (RFC 3934 only says "the WG chair should send at least one public
> warning on the WG mailing list"), given the events of last 
> October[1][2], we
> are inclined to give you this one final public warning: Such
> characterizations or other disruptive behaviour on the list will not be
> tolerated and your posting privileges will be suspended if it happens
> again.
>
> Kirsty and Pete
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/fjyO2yW8ltVLD9jL2blUMGn94SQ
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/CnaOc7y8s6L77z0h-b3DtE0gfOs
>
>
>
>
>
> This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 
> (FOIA) and may be exempt under other UK information legislation. Refer 
> any FOIA queries to [e-mail]. All material is UK Crown 
> Copyright ©
>

-- 
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius