Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

Kyle Rose <> Tue, 23 February 2021 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A37E3A2C4A for <>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:18:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RF2yTjae0cKp for <>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:18:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A32AA3A2C49 for <>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:18:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id p186so16845017ybg.2 for <>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:18:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SY/whg/iaSJE3ptutxAaC1UlkZZ71ywOdPANDl+Ao74=; b=TRR+IYGmUAf+lBlN5xa1l6rrab+6GF+KtaSOmOLKuYJjN0OM/CsMKNEkbRvXV62rx4 xintUaZeItlv6Ha2fu9p9OdAtIhBNca9G75oyuy2O7T9UXczg+/DQwc9Z9qjqAZLQWBj xkyODLnbJqwWKZhb6LeHgOqRGJcUnrM5QH2Xs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SY/whg/iaSJE3ptutxAaC1UlkZZ71ywOdPANDl+Ao74=; b=jVpZaJVDoqU5YPEYCaflnpeEBav04M3X0LU/MP83ndOUeBMEjn2+JhXrOFQ4PQvkpB hXzOTxdO4OWBbYq5fVuKp48UnB6fVasxGF2Ud6GKM/eqTR7oL1lbb9pkMEzH96N1vE24 bhqYfjanD0HK/P9xW+Z8socXr4cn7KaK5583ynG5rkGHuvpUP4TlNL++kwNffadodgj8 jna4iNn9jr0Fvo/iXEhokQVKW0PYnCDSHpy0M1lhoDuJDhpo/LJxTcXK9QglpgApTrp+ JAbDrb0og7Ft7+DuSrRSXppIUjLUxuMrOE81W4jXfg2024XWPbfa9r4rv5dw5AYp2tgP /W2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xSS2Omy1DYQ5FUuM8pnNXvU+/1M0YqHwN66OP0JGj59hV0KAM es+y6EOYpt6h1vLCvUG+5Q0tm7gW9ecjm1+SBtY0qMMFSnDqbQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrVhhPiiq93KGKyvuOcCk2pXN1Vep+HRuNxxFzHeC2m2QVI7qmTA1Jylev/Vn32SiWxqwBO12jCccJrB2pjpM=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:390:: with SMTP id 138mr40377727ybd.130.1614093505450; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:18:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Kyle Rose <>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:18:13 -0500
Message-ID: <>
To: Vittorio Bertola <>
Cc: Fernando Gont <>, GENDISPATCH List <>, Keith Moore <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000006ef2605bc026edc"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:18:28 -0000

Good list. I think one thing to keep in mind is that not all of these have
solutions, and in some cases are zero-sum. IMO, we should be careful to
limit the scope to identifying the obstacles to inclusion, and leave
solutions to later steps.

direct lack of diversity
> - gender, ethnicity, geography, age, social and professional background,
> type of employer
> - lack of "people like me", difficulty in "belonging" during meetings
> - diversity in values and views of the world

One big problem in this category that should be called out explicitly is
underrepresentation from areas of the world with networks that look
entirely unlike what we have in the West. Africa, in particular, has very
little wired coverage.

> - cost of travel to physical meetings

This is a big one. I wouldn't put it under "fees", but rather "cost of
involvement". If time were the only factor, remote participation would be
doable; but the hallway conversations at thrice-yearly meetings have no
effective substitute. (This IMO is an argument in favor of reducing
in-person meetings to 1x/year, and to help subsidize the cost of travel and
lodging for folks whose needs are underrepresented in the IETF... but now
I'm getting into potential solutions.)