IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gendispatch] Re: New Version Notification for draft-rsalz-2026bis-11.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 15 October 2024 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFE0C1D5C58 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hI3CaaokSpJ7 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B26C1D530E for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e30db524c2so2746623a91.1 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1729021149; x=1729625949; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WVUeuDN4XsjuJzaTKN7iDa8F3e1VhqBGWNlQaVWTjEs=; b=XKuF/QD63IGA65QGpPlpfhfxEHcq88Y3GKpgQGFw/1wYJulZZqpUPkuxFCh4PH4I0t vEFcP0Ai/xbK54OHS8LBYuQb9zasApsyeR57r7nNLH9RhosXtwVJXi8+RAWf6rkTBWD5 pgxxh26UqPbatUR9mNzAsLU0t1n6/7izK1hKnRvAjZEsuSkjzB6S4bAk/fN32dedv98C p/lVm18ssR77traBnkxmMjiemuNVjvn5mBv5RloB6ub5tYmiumFpbf0kU7BpUWEEpZxd ROwnO/B6gV/btDqkCNch19UXeqLwLb381uV6tolkC8G+A8xZ7RAg/ws3uRNX4bayA7YK SZRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729021149; x=1729625949; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WVUeuDN4XsjuJzaTKN7iDa8F3e1VhqBGWNlQaVWTjEs=; b=USxRd6zRTbotJ+Nv+TuW5eIT20ynYQpqZp1UUDCbxxvQ9ydPlHrMuZTUBCJOQ5zXrn ehZLB6gvMi5BLkSU46V7eVCE3lGCVdbEdyODP9ldrZqlMLJcPnD6U/FJpggVzxu9lgn6 oZHRHPypTeoDKr+kd/9kZZXeo0MS7CWxyHuaSNQJT+K/FVCPAuLNfWidGRl3JUx6fu2a nbXCMbF4zv0Mk2HjpFbV+QZotMXzUwwrVWM0l6w+7OoAeRez51heQk6+G5v/RzTDP9uj PRCYfoNeBo5gKPkSM6lEqXlDk+emGCjKWNqp3JK8z6hpWLxoNB8L5nXVgxBI6r2pWnvA Hlcg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVscu9athcfxAZ52fcPK6fLk6IYrU/rDRbUTW83xttaLWx0rknBBw2kx0t13hJTbexs5jUxqaO+b9WUEA==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzzmTwEJjNlYPNuxFa/frEzX7HDiSBDh0FRWG/1BoaK/Vhl+MB4 4tQJ4JUoKkLi38Cx+5FeVFyWUv7ic7BIQIOf5z+qX2ZbS/m2TclM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHWCQF/kb4PpWlsRbxxSc455UJ5Nia8/BNZw33L1LipS8cBSR7hh/K4UMk7Q9134lVReuDbEA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1b42:b0:2e2:e91b:f0d3 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e315431d7amr15381859a91.29.1729021149427; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707? ([2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e392f7805dsm2256942a91.57.2024.10.15.12.39.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <530a1253-41df-4567-ab10-b2d90e67ee6d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:39:05 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
References: <172839953364.104721.10816128696930288653@dt-datatracker-74758d9965-nl2b7> <0203667C-B9D0-4B11-8C7C-39DCFC860922@akamai.com> <LV8PR11MB85360E564DE32795A077B7D1B57E2@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <29B8565D-9FF6-4B78-8F84-D4A55630F9E4@akamai.com> <c6464a4c-f98d-4bc8-b879-069499ee584e@gmail.com> <082BC9D7-403D-4711-AF95-C8D10D74C6E9@akamai.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <082BC9D7-403D-4711-AF95-C8D10D74C6E9@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: 4RHZE6WJ7AQ3IKOAJGH2YUYLXLYUGRHP
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4RHZE6WJ7AQ3IKOAJGH2YUYLXLYUGRHP
X-MailFrom: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Gendispatch] Re: New Version Notification for draft-rsalz-2026bis-11.txt
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/DMf-lklltI9Ctpdpcspu-H7nn5E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gendispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-leave@ietf.org>

On 11-Oct-24 09:12, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2026/referencedby/
> 
> Thanks for that.
> 
>> I think there are bogons in there, e.g. RFC 3450 (chosen at random) references 2026 but doesn't cite the reference. But quite a few to check...
> 
> Are there?  Do we udate references when RFC N becomes RFC Nbis? I thought we just assume that the obsoleted-by tag is good enough.

We don't. Possibly we should, but that's an RSWG topic. I just wanted to observe that to do complete due diligence, we'd need to look at all of them to see if any of them are significant.

    Brian

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status