IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-ecahc-moderation-00.txt

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Fri, 08 September 2023 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0FBC15106B for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 04:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dcZJwrgqD0j7 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 04:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400::25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60550C151075 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 04:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 873728087D; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:50:32 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1694173832; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=NZhorz7OFI11ZmbHuZu+IXeAa12kxSU6iXVDbLV+6jQ=; b=V0SufWPkFL/+sHPjjDnSnuIPSqPmSmW6A+iowcE7hFSe9KiOPkgpFStAEVZLcN1RJnDEvX 9O/4EB7b0Jv7UbP2Ft7qwGvjxJFg82i5s5p3Ewo5tDAJvDUCBz/mP+FhNoiJ4aJDpEi5PG jit+BQe2DqSCEuAHx0wqT2aZ1XNaw9YBqfxUuOkmSjdQBX+0NYJV8Haw6T6bnzCTnoz2bI LxSdWs6U84oVFJkZIgjt3XQEtIZcaBfkq3g1/+MvMZJPX2N16sNRfUQZO8TdWXkOiorf4V MqYs8byfm02hFJaR3f4crxExtmdvAVDJvPnSm76a9vq6mdq9BEzHenFlJG7cBw==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_46361810-F5C8-459A-A549-132681EA3E60"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <F588647C-A9E1-40EF-8F7A-648221C5FAA3@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 14:50:34 +0300
Cc: "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <43FE0F53-6253-472B-8451-FAA68F94F3CB@eggert.org>
References: <168866528948.9864.11683631235677115587@ietfa.amsl.com> <C923D27E-85C3-4E57-A7D1-7850F0D82703@eggert.org> <F588647C-A9E1-40EF-8F7A-648221C5FAA3@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/Dbq77LXuf8Ir2tPf34DDZiDEViY>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-ecahc-moderation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 11:50:40 -0000

Hi Rich,

I've tried to address your suggestions in https://github.com/larseggert/moderation/pull/32

On Jul 6, 2023, at 22:33, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>  Have you considered having some subset of the organizational bodies and ISOC appoint members or liaisons?

I did consider this. I believe it would be quite a bit of overhead if various bodies tried to appoint moderators (many fishermen, small pond). It would also make the appeals process more complex. In terms of liaisons, it's not clear to me what their role/status as part of the moderator team would/should be?

Thanks,
Lars

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status