Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG
Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Tue, 16 February 2021 18:52 UTC
Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905903A0E37 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:52:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8SeougEKhjMV for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99563A0E32 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:52:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A2DD63888E; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:52:34 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0OSExOt4FIF7; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:52:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.16] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAC32D638885; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:52:32 -0600 (CST)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:52:32 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5769)
Message-ID: <6BE2FE63-68C3-4058-8A08-967C1F61A086@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <9C79484A-E931-43D7-860C-B85C59248445@ericsson.com>
References: <A531C377-33A4-4138-BE28-788FF5FE267E@sn3rd.com> <CABcZeBPxQrzQZZ2ec+cvpovdkJaXcQ4f8Ged7Om1QPg7UrZ_Ew@mail.gmail.com> <C7451272-56CF-49C7-ABAA-7B8849AAE8DB@cisco.com> <31dc343f-8e73-6afd-1fca-c68fb5b47bd0@lounge.org> <fabe2570-d138-8f35-f14a-a564a00ea7ba@gont.com.ar> <c425e778-429f-eedb-b730-8b6f03dfaa0d@lounge.org> <8a9633db-ecd3-7ec7-e2a6-77088e68b184@huitema.net> <C6606DCF-768C-42A3-AF9B-6547A9A0FD04@gmail.com> <121a9c85-139a-50ec-81a0-1c1c56744d83@network-heretics.com> <31A5A4B7-CDB3-477B-AD7F-ABA42B9A3852@ietf.org> <09a31e49-8d3f-4876-679f-02e673fa0497@lounge.org> <0a28cadc-52bf-282b-8d1a-099de86ca07f@gmail.com> <d6e8e575-b983-1e9a-35a1-142024044a07@lounge.org> <4732EB01-0D2A-4C6E-B58D-489EBF570864@akamai.com> <ae42fb1b-e362-2632-ee04-ff9e1d867a86@lounge.org> <CD1B8572-E8E6-4E4C-9FFE-F038EFFABAE5@akamai.com> <7dc731ec-cc55-9231-c26f-ab0623bd138e@lounge.org> <67286F24-5D16-4341-885B-1005A8170B0C@ericsson.com> <dd2719d1-30ec-0571-3684-49eb607ddde2@lounge.org> <9C79484A-E931-43D7-860C-B85C59248445@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/EsXoPmfL2bWopMGKSMfASKYiy-k>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 18:52:39 -0000
To add: If you feel someone has crossed the line, better to drop a note to the chairs rather than try to deal with it yourself on the list. We will have discussions with folks offline and address the issues as appropriate. pr On 16 Feb 2021, at 12:34, Francesca Palombini wrote: > All, > > I have started a thread mail with Dan offline, and this is not a reply > to him, but a note to the whole working group. > > I wanted to ask everybody to please keep the conversation productive > in talking about the charter, and ways of improving it. Emotions and > frustrations are getting in the way of having a constructive > discussion, so please keep the conversation respectful. There has been > several messages in the mailing list that were, if not out of line, on > the line. I do not intend to be policing this mailing list, but I ask > you to please keep the conversation respectful. > > Thanks, > Francesca > > On 16/02/2021, 18:26, "Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> wrote: > > > Wow! > > Hi Francesca, > > On 2/16/21 8:49 AM, Francesca Palombini wrote: > > Dan, > > > > I trust you can make your point and state your opinion without > being purposely inflammatory. As always, although it is ok to > disagree, it is not ok and does not lead to a productive discussion to > put down other people's opinions in this way. > > > > [1] I do not find Jay's mail to be ascribing motives to specific > people, he is comparing two different situations. > > No, he's comparing two different groups of people. In fact, he > specifically > says "people". I'm not sure how you can say he's comparing > situations when > he specifically says "people"! > > Let me quote him for you: "Having wealthy, credentialed, white > people > take the > issue of diversity and inclusivity seriously enough to try to > explicitly and > publicly change their behaviours is to me neither patronising nor > disempowering.... > The alternative of wealthy, credentialed, white people not wishing > to do > that > makes me wary that either they are racist, or sympathise with > racists, > or seek to > diminish or ignore the historic impact of racism." > > Notice how he's not talking about situations. He's talking > about > people. And > he's talking specifically about a certain class of people. And if > that > certain > class of people doesn't take his issue "seriously enough" then he > fears that > they are racists or people who sympathize with racists or people > who wish to > "diminish or ignore the historic impact of racism". > > Situations? I'm sorry but no. Read his email again. > > > Also please do not refer to Jay's opinions as "platitudes" - I > believe you can pass the message you want to pass without the > denigratory characterization. > > I did not say that Jay's opinions were platitudes. What I said > was that > the statements of the "wealthy, credentialed, white people" were > platitudes. > I said that they needed to say the platitudes that Jay wanted to > hear > (otherwise > he would assume his alternative that they're racists). Big > difference. > > > [2] I do not think Martin's characterization of "obstructionist" > is anything else than a statement that people don't want this wg to be > created. I do not find the term offensive, but that might be because > of the fact that I am not a native speaker. > > I don't find Martin's statement offensive either. I responded > to Martin > simply because what he said was pretty much exactly what Keith > said. > > What's interesting is that you are responding to my statement > to Martin > and Jay but you are silent on Mark's response to Keith. What's > your take > on Mark's rebuke of Keith for saying "some people are more > concerned with > appearance than reality"? That's as inoffensive as Martin saying > that some > people are obstructionists here. Yet you don't feel compelled to > tell Mark > your feelings about his email! > > If you want to be the cop here then I think you need to walk > your beat > in a much less biased way. > > > If you find any email in the mailing list personally offensive, > please reach out to the chairs and do not escalate. Because of the > high volume and timezone difference there might be a delay dealing > with it, but we are here for that. > > I'm not personally offended but I do think that your email is > offensive in > its selective target. > > Dan. > > > Thanks, > > Francesca > > > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/zNoAGb6-GAFRS-8YLCV_PsFc_2I/ > > [2] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/bRuBH1Xe_UaMg385w4-pY7cbUz0/ > > > > On 16/02/2021, 00:58, "Gendispatch on behalf of Dan Harkins" > <gendispatch-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of dharkins@lounge.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2/15/21 3:25 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > >> The thing I take issue with was directed at > "people", a collection of > > > persons. > > > > > > So you took it as individuals, and I took people, > especially given the second paragraph, as members of an organization > and he was talking about organizational statements. > > > > Well I actually said that those people can (partially) > make up an > > organization so I don't think our statements are too far > off. I just > > don't think that is terribly relevant. > > > > >> Why are you wading in to this Rich? > > > Because I am trying to understand why some people are so > opposed to this. > > > > Opposed to what? > > > > To be perfectly honest, if Keith hadn't been admonished > I wouldn't have > > said a thing. But if we're gonna have some rules here then > I think it's > > important that everyone play by them. So if it's not OK to > say that some > > people are more concerned with appearance than reality (and > I guess it's > > not OK even if it's true) then it's not OK to say that > people who don't > > mouth the platitudes that Jay wants to hear are racists, > and it's not OK > > for Martin to say that a few people are obstructionists. > > > > Of course I would be happy to allow all those statements > to be freely > > expressed on the list but then I like free speech, even > that which upsets > > others. Seems that is not a universal feeling here though. > > > > Dan. > > > > -- > > "The object of life is not to be on the side of the > majority, but to > > escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- > Marcus Aurelius > > > > -- > > Gendispatch mailing list > > Gendispatch@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch > > > > -- > "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but > to > escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus > Aurelius
- [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-rel… Sean Turner
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… John Levine
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Christian Huitema
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Christian Huitema
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… John Levine
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Christian Huitema
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Jay Daley
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Jay Daley
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Jay Daley
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Jay Daley
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Jay Daley
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology… Eliot Lear
- [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter tex… Sean Turner
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter… Bill Woodcock
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised (was: Re: draft charter… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Brian E Carpenter
- [Gendispatch] New List (Was: revised) Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Nico Williams
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Nico Williams
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [Gendispatch] revised Nico Williams