IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-iesg-review-workload-00.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 31 March 2023 04:55 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39E5C151B2C for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.096, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G45_nQhVcPwT for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com (mail-ed1-f54.google.com [209.85.208.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49AD4C15154F for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id w9so85055228edc.3 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680238506; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=X8dTUMrPkDg13w5qyUlGPRqtpqsO9XVrwG5rEnmKMUk=; b=B53TU1TjrvsHkJNuvOue0YN1nVAV90GWmBZ6RC3dEiHFd/ECWNOb9gBwTyjYPzEuSp rVeTXNOPTT6qCWRtA228QDGpO1rN/aUCQ13rOzEnAUVNABLusmYnB04XUlWgV7Pyl9Zm fzPb01eT7fn55/Qeg4fMm2CD607/SvA9+ctxKlLwaao5CYQDNRrfwXWz22cp/0u+LwrK YIjlGzw7patDYlSRMMmcfakr1Xmhu1xLxJQH0Hw1vvhD07h/35hALG2FHUak9L9hbZiT hMAt8CWo48LusNuCaczKZsmlnP9y/3oDTnb8zopoazPKXBIV7Lp0dSxJS8cflAXlkGn5 f/lA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dDuRN9oF/FNcE0PR+hoHosQnW1y9dQnkd3/Z0ljHFAHjOpRd+H HZh6qZB11PYl9G7UokUmLZHcqBhZH0oCf3sqFiAokZwddTY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+6oIy2aHa0AngMqnPFcbvyaOlzEfBJTQb3hu0Iwis1ll1BlLQSEevXGKAoVwtlWs4CgIh6nyleyUpH4VCygv0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:869f:b0:8b8:aef3:f2a9 with SMTP id qa31-20020a170907869f00b008b8aef3f2a9mr12283901ejc.0.1680238506472; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168016566375.62790.7482502869993780606@ietfa.amsl.com> <180F04B6-DD6F-4034-9318-E5975570229A@mnot.net> <89babe8e-1022-e6bd-22f2-137b4189e678@joelhalpern.com> <fec8ee0c-e252-41d7-b27c-dd4891f639f3@app.fastmail.com> <065c01d9636b$3467d210$9d377630$@olddog.co.uk> <61BA29BE-B36B-4F44-A0D7-4E623ECFC9DE@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <61BA29BE-B36B-4F44-A0D7-4E623ECFC9DE@mnot.net>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:54:55 +0900
Message-ID: <CALaySJKaTPiyRt2wVEGfBEqrp-Ssu1_+ag2_ufJSNzSVQiKr4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot=40mnot.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/EtvwS4lPT3Pqx0KUbrYCFdOcMAk>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-iesg-review-workload-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 04:55:08 -0000

> Perhaps we could get clarity on a single question: does the community expect every AD to personally
> read and engage with (e.g., reviewing, raising issues, approving of the contents) every page of every
> document submitted to them?

If it does expect that, then we're in deep natto, because I don't
think I've ever met an AD who could honestly say that he/she/it did.
I certainly did not.  I did my best to make sure that I was
comfortable with the level of review that every document got, but that
did not always translate to my personal review of every document, nor
my personal review of every page of documents that I did review.  I
think most ADs will likely say that their mode of operation was
similar.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email