IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sun, 05 September 2021 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B303A10F5 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 22:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ppNuYDfVLuJm for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 22:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA69E3A10F3 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 22:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id r6so3388542ilt.13 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 22:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YY7m6MR6CsTprIjDGemzTI8WueXsgpjGtzSY4nHI/ks=; b=fQf2xfxpUE9gVAtlUP8kvtElD1jUWm/UVSKqtdWamoTVxAc7jZ3JUHlzVh8PU44JuC AuVNH9ifzISAvX39X243imhAme4cX9WNaXUQShKHSWhLGgsBO35ttA/RG2m7Khk7g+Hi 8Wf1PidLNkwwLBqKnv6bV6Oum27mQAeWoSTV+ddoQESvz9Ff+z3TGWntQNSXOuH8Rzwp 46uSrzcNbck5VNNiK5GcKlDeHz91h+2omAnlbdNINwrFsgJ0TrOZg6ZVz5UKKjUVHyHy FOl/lNVgLTunXr8eGL4WmITglGJbq7dNDnHEK6TGFHDX1zguB113vm8cgtH3N4Ev97/g ttLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YY7m6MR6CsTprIjDGemzTI8WueXsgpjGtzSY4nHI/ks=; b=VzsYrpEqDoMG9a8jNTTSGDWDv2B2JBmL4FoKzLLZ5ZMaU1oVhypQxYg9IuHEelQZY8 AYTS8qCTr6+L74F43/AZlCUuuTbLw3EK/b8OXR8g0KOsxsQLkIbMTBWOetGnAwLklNm5 VEz9GVbM1DsjnEmeLVxLcHTlvTG2cXTtt7ys1qWBxyDI1EyQ9NZpea14xJ1EvAEPyqOQ fStj5D+oPQCbUPszf8yrJQMg7TQbi6E4rqAQpsCNPnlp+9i5bKLZP7ZGg2l5MDN3Ma0a YhhhgvNmlh3JvFSc43AtfYQG8fkYnAg1+dzmdRZ19k+pOXRfnFTM3TsK5Iw+twuGCxZ9 lN4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PLU6OQL1GZB83iJ0y31lBAPwub12utOOtgzy84Z71O39muS1l BXRvGNyLc9FrfKKkxqmw6R3MlyxH3aWQ+b3+JzW6ZT3a
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjXKlvDZGplgWelPvgZXYeEAfkFUy0t3WGK/esCSFJcrXIESukucei63FSrgRhEJM+Aq4rDLOYEUb1d+dAlH8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:194c:: with SMTP id x12mr4214165ilu.155.1630819714337; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 22:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163037412640.15437.266878243771416247@ietfa.amsl.com> <7a43a750-f6e6-096d-8f89-a1c5a4fd2cb9@cs.tcd.ie> <ea3ed95f-8d23-6b2a-2bb5-12c7b1b50c33@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6Sysc7bnah1t0w2EuMEwvO0Y2V8zVdsupNi9r8v2EQ=csQ@mail.gmail.com> <5da63a02-bbc2-98a9-5a19-745179744192@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SwjazBjSj6XzmCDO0pnsibxohU=40TkJ0GnAJ+_t5zSHw@mail.gmail.com> <05211e39-419d-2455-ffa3-1a55fab22a48@joelhalpern.com> <CANMZLAaiPjeO7wMrfjjd5-XJpzYm3iUTExdUqD+JBm9mCYgvNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SztfuauB1vTLpu6L-AeaShRfZ-Ybs_d+2p8oaMBBvKjyQ@mail.gmail.com> <f706ce7f-2967-50ad-eaf0-e9b168b5a6e8@gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw+KVW_Jq5LZFN_KJ9ygxb9=sFoRNs2yAPeiPLV3A1Y=w@mail.gmail.com> <9b819b2d-4de2-800d-190c-4c7cbfc2465e@gmail.com> <CAChr6Sy_F6yg2UGC_LSBvpMQr25bwH=CUq9jh78_h13iyyh9yg@mail.gmail.com> <7da21d8a-bdc1-6974-c485-9ed1b2e4910a@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SxzYCC=eYySGuAeHY6=pXcAR+sBvAR7iuqTqcDwitb4LA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sy3=xWWejpPrmMRSgE18CNVs29NtxzJfv_nm55oXq215g@mail.gmail.com> <a508dcfb-26f6-89f2-4ef3-a7befe9db95a@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <a508dcfb-26f6-89f2-4ef3-a7befe9db95a@joelhalpern.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 22:28:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SzFb0dPiMjysknHfBMk1__HRPb463bLCveJQq=fmpOKZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c4116005cb38cdbd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/GCiWFpCaoJC9BGvTXJtasO6s7K8>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:28:42 -0000

On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:16 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> As far as I can tell Rob, you are asking to remove words that have
> value.  I do not understand any of your requests for removal.
>

Joel,

It's not really a great argument to claim that text "has value" without
describing what that value is.

I removed one paragraph in the text I sent, because it was no longer needed
given the descriptive, rather than prescriptive, language I used. The other
things were rephrased.

IETF participants come to the organization with many different
antitrust/competitive concerns. As such, the prescriptive text in the
current draft could be viewed as anti-competitive in the way it recommends
against permitted topics, although I think this is unintentional. If the
goal is to make participants aware of these issues, my suggested
descriptive text is fine. If the goal is to protect the IETF, I think the
current text is actually worse than the status quo.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email