Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

Juliana Guerra <juliana@derechosdigitales.org> Tue, 23 February 2021 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <juliana@derechosdigitales.org>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE043A0A3B for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:00:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=derechosdigitales.org header.b=gbVzQATP; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Zs5fr2y6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4AuPQR_TzSSD for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:00:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B63B3A0A2E for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:00:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100A25C0074 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:00:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:00:33 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= derechosdigitales.org; h=to:references:from:subject:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=5y8xZWZBfAd1Q0bZu+EntfTapD 4Lvs9y81wurJG87P0=; b=gbVzQATPYJs7vFtJ00YRc96R5JHnzTO+d0sp832B5a K8D3f4wo0tRcTC0rYzBtZgEUCNZI2q81Omc/LxitabMFEUnTWqZN1bS+Ipp+cd8U wg1ZBFc/o2m9T4BNUTUREkQpbRTdL2Qqa0bdgwZE4BDm2BeTki8jUN7P/AFNDfGI 151S+WoTGPlKixULloPLFKxtegg6Q2jcF4cDO1MUDWJBn0114D0qL2C7jfmdSLdp E1vPDPf/6LfWK6fL/aMqFXaXrbJ8sddx8WqG3FeR/vxmt2fZL2PLz4FijcQ1wjzi nlxIsBhYjIBY7NAVeb/ttOWWo8/2kPGlIEjvBtIuCmvQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=5y8xZWZBfAd1Q0bZu+EntfTapD4Lvs9y81wurJG87 P0=; b=Zs5fr2y6+J2kZyXaxwS25NQ6EoW7jkAgokgQsXP9hGknASnWqMg3MdYIc Hje4wTQx4wjHtq2FSmEmoVigKftxJF6Lf1uDYie4MMp1RaYdX+5V/6uWJPzU247R zfP6slwYdz1SpNHNhIBa+v9rAUyoi+dLmWmN5XPBV4DfcN/SpkcV00ofdBBrhhoB S1CfAnd/zgCeRK7qOyNktBtO9Yl/jlqjfN7ygk/T0VG+daO2eWTqgqbi3wh2TjYT Sz+FWJmNbiBRjYFU2KpCYcr+NvF9XfC+nR8eODlMgh2bFS+YADBPjwaiez2dXkM8 1KecwPMikUBYsGYJt3aF/eK6gIupQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:sDQ1YE4FgccOHc9lzoBYcc5Ijt2WtqRtLDXb_CDbarw5x8eQ0C3nmQ> <xme:sDQ1YLHk2Yy47JrvW1C_Wn7rVfcKt7kfnip-QyX0E_2PWxJXbRmazDx6Nu8Olp0f3 BExfitYi3_rZCeu>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeehgdelhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepvfhfhffukffffgggjggtgfesthekre dttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhulhhirghnrgcuifhuvghrrhgruceojhhulhhirghnrges uggvrhgvtghhohhsughighhithgrlhgvshdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepve ekgfeifeduveejgfekieduffffheeugfelkeejhfekiedtvedutdfggeetfeegnecuffho mhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudeivddrvdegjedrjeefrdduleefnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhhulhhirghn rgesuggvrhgvtghhohhsughighhithgrlhgvshdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:sDQ1YEVjIe4X3hEfnCImtYcnl4llTjNRk9-Ott73b_CYQASdxJB2_A> <xmx:sDQ1YPWSxj-TVduq8qdmGG13TgBEHfsL1bRLUyOOr6YxbYbj5RqTew> <xmx:sDQ1YKKQJLJgd9BPXNOKVOQiaZMlTgjCJVWbKZwnJ2z-Ai7osCYskw> <xmx:sTQ1YBh14zYC_KDqAEOzpLFa2YCG0fKGpZbCyuwYdq-ZBH1U951uvA>
Received: from [10.41.1.146] (testbed-users.calyx.net [162.247.73.193]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1932524005C for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:00:31 -0500 (EST)
To: gendispatch@ietf.org
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com>
From: Juliana Guerra <juliana@derechosdigitales.org>
Message-ID: <2b9ed952-a255-72a2-6a83-46a8eed46f96@derechosdigitales.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:00:30 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/HfHA_MtlHcKUy4P5wbTExjc9FL8>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:00:36 -0000

Hi Fernando, thanks for this important document. Some comments:

- This sentence "Lack of diversity in IETF groups and leadership roles
has a direct effect on IETF participation, as a result of" is confusing,
and is only followed by a description in detail of "lack of diversity."

- For language inclusiveness, I recommend to replace "his" with "their"
or "his or her" in cases such as "WG chair leaves his role"

- With regard to Section 11.2, I think it's necessary to say something
more about the "bit of an art to using [email] efectively". Maybe
describing some specific IETF lists dynamics.

- In section 11.3 Comfort Zone, I missed at least a comment about the
difficulties and necessary compromises to deal with disagreement and
difference. I think it would be useful to mention RFC 7154 and RFC 7776,
and consider the list Vittorio B shared before.


And two comments following the conversation here:

- I agree that it would be better for the draft to focus on identifying
obstacles to inclusion.

- I think the "mostly running code" issue is out of scope in this draft.


Regards!

Juliana G





On 22/02/21 19:07, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> We have submitted a new I-D, entitled "Diversity and Inclusiveness in
> the IETF".
> 
> The I-D is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gont-diversity-analysis-00.txt
> 
> We expect that our document be discussed in the gendispatch wg
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/gendispatch/about/). But given the
> breadth of the topic and possible views, we'll be glad to discuss it
> where necessary/applicable/desired.
> 
> As explicitly noted in our I-D, we're probably only scratching the
> surface here -- but we believe that our document is probably a good
> start to discuss many aspects of diversity that deserve discussion.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Regards,