IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-03.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sun, 23 October 2022 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A097C14F732 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 14:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=BvhZcco+; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=fRzpd8Km
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kecEmyz76gzZ for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 14:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F27BBC14F731 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 14:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B5D5C005A; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 17:41:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 23 Oct 2022 17:41:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1666561270; x= 1666647670; bh=8DttThbpWzJk6KlO79JBo+e2+SS0ImxzSxR7cp+qRS4=; b=B vhZcco+UEChYhSsZ8wjToDkk36ntqSGT/GGN3jzukumPNuPhNY2ITyaG6tBqDYV2 RF9rW11ztg6d3bKU3+KRJ8ossqfu6V6RP52ycadej0k2aAdwt5y/Cesl0fuHQH06 oi3NXF/ic2bOKLNy0kLg6zIoZq/EiiaIuOk25PMg8V86+eJHBy99JcTGRErIff+f P8EplTF1GVZOqwsd0TE8N+rBfQ/RR/Mcy7kc9qbNWVZmkY/ht3wOVUXiCKb/ccSu 554IVLbP3s1QZUpIrFijfa4XI7vOOjE1SKDLxG4lQldSQ9xwBOdkqE8ND8H+0Zpf 4S3iXPbWQQWevTteC1Rdg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1666561270; x= 1666647670; bh=8DttThbpWzJk6KlO79JBo+e2+SS0ImxzSxR7cp+qRS4=; b=f Rzpd8KmxOPSPzq0P7l+2rCpy464bCgPqZY0VybhvO5nnRSR64svJCsdDKrycvYbl Op4jKhykLwRxuqfdD6pwqM9DnndORcuEndJtSXl/Vocf2J4ptxzTGQXhgMvFBAzh AQ6cPxI7MdYuf17ww2of9UR01Mbh48O9wMyAjE4qPjnrptIhd6WbKFNe6rWj6ykm j7CUYh//vspXzuNSeNMD2ltPSO17xPVJMrL8mCCI8+U9JvNlhiXAGx9E9kTszl61 8VL2yzIxIsbV+aPMlStjR/wTuuF9QuYjSEG/tc6Dsh33a9LSye9JN3qaoGtBWkWt IgDUpRvCz8Ry/C2Rr9/uA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:9rRVY2AMlWCIZ5UxAqqOYSsAIErQcfFpp7C3oqdjjrqJu2StAj_asA> <xme:9rRVYwihCvlPe_aZRnOhCqIYipqfeVCpuHSDZFbvo-6-kV4rs12LDljHzxAUP-qDB cR-TXlEDtol4bpv4w>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:9rRVY5kY9PD1p6ZfE672ecjw54_XMMGx1olmBHEsuEBKq3i39fkysHL3ffBjia3UvlqEb42_Vw-2dYnEXBh9E9ikJ8MoIRuvFMp5h0A4Yt6ne93wYHaSXJuj>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrgedtfedgtddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghr khcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnheptddtgefgueevtddugfdtkeffudegveetffegjeelhfdvtedvueejteegueeg teetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:9rRVY0xb94WjfMZY-ggiFG2PzK_owUAZp63PKU9SVf_sd6dTxhtBCg> <xmx:9rRVY7Trq5RnB3SULZhGisgDpeeSxfXEMbKGolzCRCePr9i4Od8cew> <xmx:9rRVY_avzaWf73-XY3MYQ6xhVIWRKXkSlBubart6aX5Yc6MowJLIlg> <xmx:9rRVYyIE6mf8jeEV8zaN93oLvT1-FgPrF5i3t5WYY2hbva2BGiFyTA>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 17:41:09 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <58e68b60-0b62-ab99-3f07-8ec689680347@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:41:06 +1100
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3BC93084-A5BF-4A5B-A503-BDD003EB35F5@mnot.net>
References: <20221023031849.135234D275E4@ary.local> <58e68b60-0b62-ab99-3f07-8ec689680347@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/J8CEyEFC7MoKmey2P8LqLqhnr2o>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-03.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 21:41:21 -0000

Stephen,

> On 24 Oct 2022, at 4:04 am, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> The concept of a red-flag as per this draft is a bad
> idea. It is true some topics are problematic in terms
> of competition law for some people, but that just does
> not imply those same topics are problematic for all
> participants.

As the draft states, part of the purpose here is to establish defences for the IETF as a venue. Establishing a policy is a big part of that, and by necessity the policy has to apply to everyone equally. 

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email