IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-01.txt

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 08 December 2021 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAFF3A07E4 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:56:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wg7CLieeu_zH for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:56:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4714A3A07E3 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:56:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.29.192]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 1B8MucFS009927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:56:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1639004210; x=1639090610; i=@elandsys.com; bh=1dkhkozKHBcLEPCO/St6EgTTyNkfo8EQdIfqwurhHTw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=q6gPBo0BFkLm7v7FrugeS/eOJdBDbIsDCtWWweB2rPuBtvkz15qvphzcqcmu0wezU xB3FGwnbP4hojkD50LCItL5R9iOTWHreWQdeMJ1O7++5K/2y+zOmp9BM4God4m43F9 3WWepdfwxscK1rXGIYMaiGwB6p81ZMFKaLEccCWE=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20211208144553.0b318fd8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 14:52:28 -0800
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, gendispatch@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <FF87658D-B09A-45C8-8484-85D71DCF2D95@mnot.net>
References: <163595251682.11706.5053299985084837548@ietfa.amsl.com> <8854c3cc-694b-1a7f-ebc8-47bed9bb4e0f@joelhalpern.com> <E1D78C01-243A-49A5-83F7-C4D7198536CF@biddle.law> <FF87658D-B09A-45C8-8484-85D71DCF2D95@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/JCYvk7YoV67aeqs5uGpqm1vsrb0>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 22:56:59 -0000

Hi Mark,
At 03:19 PM 22-11-2021, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>Thanks, Brad. I think this is the right framing, FWIW.
>
>Related but tangental question: Does the IETF have any particular 
>reason for not opting into protection under the Standards Developing 
>Organization Act of 2004 in the US? Last time I looked at the 
>Federal Register, we were nowhere to be seen...

Was there a response to the above question?

It doesn't look like the Standards Developing Organization Act of 
2004 is applicable to the IETF.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email